Friday, April 20, 2007
« Avoiding traffic signals | Main | A picture's worth a thousand words, or a... »

Well, my ride home yesterday wasn't successful. I did get home, and it only took twice as long as usual, but sadly my first attempt to go traffic-light-less just didn't work out. Even though I had a pretty useful scrap of paper with cryptic notation concerning the streets and intersections I planned to use (nose in the map is not allowed, but consulting a scribbled sheet on the fly is OK)

I did reduce the number of traffic signals to six, but also including a few non-legal maneuvers. My real failing was in my clever attempt to avoid traffic signals by (legally) riding in parks. However, I failed to notice that nearly all of the park entrances were protected by traffic signals (so that park users can enter and leave safely, I guess). This was even the case where motor vehicles were quite clearly prohibited. My no-backtracking rule also left me at two park exits, facing a traffic signal, and unable to backtrack and try a different exit.

There were also a couple of places where bicycle riding isn't quite kosher but this is not apparent from the map. Mostly pavement/sidewalk riding, albeit very briefly (e.g. Woburn Walk, which looks like a road on the map, but is quite obviously pedestrian-only. I should have remembered this, working just around the corner. Or another road which dead-ends, and the only place to ride is across a pavement/sidewalk onto the adjoining road). The only other rule-breaking occurred when I saw a traffic signal ahead and had no place to go but the wrong way on a one-way street (maybe a very good possibility in the other direction, though, as long as I can solve my "park problem").

So yesterday's score is 5 traffic lights, 4 riding in pedestrian areas, and one "wrong way". I think I can do better, but some more obsessive-compulsive behavior will be necessary.

Tuesday, April 24, 2007 4:10:05 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Hey Dude.

Just happened by your blog while looking for cycling info. Very interesting. I cycle in London rather than bus or tube or any other public transport. I dont find that the traffic lights are such a big problem though. Maybe it's just me. I do like to get to where I am going as fast as possible, I also like to keep up with traffic and I guess I do make my fair share of illegal maneouvers, but this is the advantage of being on a bike ne's pas? I have argued my way out of police custody more than a few times with well intentioned arguments about visibility, speed and obviously profuse apologies and promises to never let it happen again.

I do enjoy cycling in London though, I hate the Camden/finsbury park area though! Must have the worst kept, bumpiest and most pot-holed roads in the whole city as I am sure you know.

All the best in your traffic light avoidance project.

Regards.

Dave.
Tuesday, April 24, 2007 4:29:27 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
Thanks for the comment. In actuality it sounds like my riding style is really similar to yours, I'll blow through any old red light if it looks safe to do so, etc etc.

I started wondering about the possibility of avoiding traffic lights completely once I realized that my two main routes differ so much (50 vs 25).
If I do manage this challenge, you can be sure I'll only do it once, as proof it can be done. A totally pointless effort, it's true. For some reason I seem compelled to take on these sorts of challenges on occasion. I think last time it was trying to comply 100% with the Highway Code including their recommended practices (such as never let go of the handlebars), and previous challenges have included "never braking" and "never touching a foot down" (hmm, maybe I should try one of these again now that I've moved house).
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):