<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Confederacy of a Dunce - read</title>
    <link>http://newpics.org/david/</link>
    <description />
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>David Vinson</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:59:41 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.6315.0</generator>
    <managingEditor>ucjtdpv@ucl.ac.uk</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>ucjtdpv@ucl.ac.uk</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=7457f126-49d6-4886-9633-fa7a4b36b51e</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,7457f126-49d6-4886-9633-fa7a4b36b51e.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <font face="Verdana" size="2">I'm a huge
fan of local newspapers, and in my part of London I have a good half dozen or more
weekly papers to choose from.  But they do not always present their news in the
clearest and most sensible manner.  For example, check out the following from <a href="http://www.hamhigh.co.uk">Ham
&amp; High</a> (i.e. Hampstead and Highgate) March 20, 2008 exactly as it appeared
in the paper:<br /><br /><img src="http://newpics.org/david/images/Crime_prevention.jpg" alt="Crime_prevention.jpg" border="0" height="313" width="421" /><br /><br /><br />
I don't care how incompetent the donkey was at preventing crime, surely it doesn't
deserve to be crucified!  And as usual for London it appears that a large mob
has turned out for the public execution.<br /><br /><br />
Of course this is actually just a classic example of silly layout, as you can see
by the wider angle:<br /><br /><img src="http://newpics.org/david/images/crime_prevention_big.jpg" alt="crime_prevention_big.jpg" border="0" height="448" width="434" /><br /><br /><br /></font>
        <p>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=7457f126-49d6-4886-9633-fa7a4b36b51e" />
      </body>
      <title>Police cull half their crime prevention team</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,7457f126-49d6-4886-9633-fa7a4b36b51e.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/PoliceCullHalfTheirCrimePreventionTeam.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:59:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;font face="Verdana" size="2"&gt;I'm a huge fan of local newspapers, and in my part of
London I have a good half dozen or more weekly papers to choose from.&amp;nbsp; But they
do not always present their news in the clearest and most sensible manner.&amp;nbsp; For
example, check out the following from &lt;a href="http://www.hamhigh.co.uk"&gt;Ham &amp;amp;
High&lt;/a&gt; (i.e. Hampstead and Highgate) March 20, 2008 exactly as it appeared in the
paper:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://newpics.org/david/images/Crime_prevention.jpg" alt="Crime_prevention.jpg" border="0" height="313" width="421"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don't care how incompetent the donkey was at preventing crime, surely it doesn't
deserve to be crucified!&amp;nbsp; And as usual for London it appears that a large mob
has turned out for the public execution.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Of course this is actually just a classic example of silly layout, as you can see
by the wider angle:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://newpics.org/david/images/crime_prevention_big.jpg" alt="crime_prevention_big.jpg" border="0" height="448" width="434"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=7457f126-49d6-4886-9633-fa7a4b36b51e" /&gt;</description>
      <category>read</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=809dd55a-3193-4e96-90f4-fbe86ca30c20</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,809dd55a-3193-4e96-90f4-fbe86ca30c20.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <font face="Verdana" size="2">
          <a href="">Previous</a> / <a href="">Next</a><br /><br />
Now and then (i.e. "all the time") I read blogs or other web content that has a handy
navigation tool at the bottom of some pages, like the broken version illustrated above.
But there's some maddening inconsistency about the way these things are used. Sometimes
older content is referred to by "Previous" (because after all, it was written earlier,
and therefore previous in time) and other times by "Next" (because in many cases one
starts reading at the present, and therefore earlier posts have now become later in
the reading sequence). Coupled with this is the problem of browser-based navigation
which uses forward or back (sensibly mapped onto "Next" and "Previous" respectively)
regardless of the sort of link one may have used to get there.<br /><br />
Sometimes you get sensible labels like "Older" or "Newer", or numbered entries (a
system that doesn't work all that well for regularly updated push-down sorts of content,
I suppose), but a lot of the time you don't. It's especially messy when the individual
doing the browsing has many pages open at once, likes to navigate using multiple methods,
and is totally scatterbrained. </font>
        <br />
        <p>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=809dd55a-3193-4e96-90f4-fbe86ca30c20" />
      </body>
      <title>Previous / Next</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,809dd55a-3193-4e96-90f4-fbe86ca30c20.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/PreviousNext.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:38:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;font face="Verdana" size="2"&gt; &lt;a href=""&gt;Previous&lt;/a&gt; / &lt;a href=""&gt;Next&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now and then (i.e. "all the time") I read blogs or other web content that has a handy
navigation tool at the bottom of some pages, like the broken version illustrated above.
But there's some maddening inconsistency about the way these things are used. Sometimes
older content is referred to by "Previous" (because after all, it was written earlier,
and therefore previous in time) and other times by "Next" (because in many cases one
starts reading at the present, and therefore earlier posts have now become later in
the reading sequence). Coupled with this is the problem of browser-based navigation
which uses forward or back (sensibly mapped onto "Next" and "Previous" respectively)
regardless of the sort of link one may have used to get there.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Sometimes you get sensible labels like "Older" or "Newer", or numbered entries (a
system that doesn't work all that well for regularly updated push-down sorts of content,
I suppose), but a lot of the time you don't. It's especially messy when the individual
doing the browsing has many pages open at once, likes to navigate using multiple methods,
and is totally scatterbrained. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=809dd55a-3193-4e96-90f4-fbe86ca30c20" /&gt;</description>
      <category>read</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=fffee659-9e85-4573-a372-1acfa835bcf7</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,fffee659-9e85-4573-a372-1acfa835bcf7.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <font face="Verdana" size="2">Today on
the bus ride to work, I overheard two undergraduate students complaining about the
way their English literature essays had been marked. The main problem (in these students'
eyes) related to the totally unfair and arbitrary manner in which their instructor
used her own personal judgement in determining which kinds of sources were relevant
and which were not. The phrase "books and papers by dead old white men" was bandied
about, and it was suggested that this instructor's pro-dead/old/white/male attitude
was having a drastic negative impact on the educational validity and relevance of
the class, and therefore to their educational experience as a whole. I (mentally)
nodded along at first; after all there's no shortage of current authors writing on
the topic, placing the work in whatever sort of context one might imagine as being
possibly relevant (and many that are frankly a stretch even for the stretchy mind).<br /><br />
But then, it turned out they were not actually contrasting dusty old tomes by long-lived,
long-dead, long-white, long-males to spanking new ultra-relevant works complete with
ISBN-13s which the instructor had unfairly discarded due to her irrational love of
the long-everything publications mentioned above. No, the instructor's main beef with
the essays was that a number of the students had made the same rather unusual point,
mostly using a rather unusual turn of phrase, which happened to originate from Wikipedia.
Now I'm not saying that <a href="http://nikhilb.in/nucleus/index.php?itemid=694">Wikipedia
is the devil</a>, but merely that university students should probably rely on more
than encyclopedias to write their papers. And if they do write their papers mainly
from encyclopedias, they should suffer accordingly. Maybe Wikipedia's authors and
editors are alive, and often young (erm, I'll have to get back to you on the "white
male" business. I have my suspicions), but Wikipedia should hardly be considered as
a primary source (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_publisher_of_original_thought">Wikipedia
is not a publisher of original thought</a>). It might be an entirely reasonable starting
point to get some ideas if you're totally devoid of them, but it's never a good idea
to pass off the ideas, or worse, the words, of Wikipedia as your own. It's particularly
bad if you don't acknowledge the source and are not even clever enough to change the
words around.<br /><br />
Frankly, I'm surprised that university students were caught by Wikipedia in this way,
and they're lucky they were only downgraded instead of being swatted across the room
for incompetent plagiarism. But it must be really terrible for teachers of slightly
younger students, trying to get them to actually read assigned books in this day and
age of instantly available summary information of all kinds. Back in the olden days,
of course, the main way of doing this was through Cliffs Notes [sic?], whose distinctive
cover design marked you out as a cheat from a hundred paces, and which were (allegedly)
kept by most teachers for comparison with unusually insightful essays. Or by re-using
a very good paper from someone else in some other year, possibly changing a few words
here and there to hide the paper's origin (or at worst, just using White-Out to replace
the original author's name with your own). This, however, required access to (a) a
good paper, (b) from someone older, (c) on the right topic, which were seldom available.
The Dunce family library, however, contained a number of highly abridged classic novels,
which I understand were rented out to classmates by <a href="http://brianvinson10.blogspot.com">a
certain relative of mine</a> for book-report purposes. Shameful indeed. But not as
shameful as university students cutting and pasting from Wikipedia! </font>
        <p>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=fffee659-9e85-4573-a372-1acfa835bcf7" />
      </body>
      <title>Analysis of Literature</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,fffee659-9e85-4573-a372-1acfa835bcf7.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/AnalysisOfLiterature.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:58:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;font face="Verdana" size="2"&gt;Today on the bus ride to work, I overheard two undergraduate
students complaining about the way their English literature essays had been marked.
The main problem (in these students' eyes) related to the totally unfair and arbitrary
manner in which their instructor used her own personal judgement in determining which
kinds of sources were relevant and which were not. The phrase "books and papers by
dead old white men" was bandied about, and it was suggested that this instructor's
pro-dead/old/white/male attitude was having a drastic negative impact on the educational
validity and relevance of the class, and therefore to their educational experience
as a whole. I (mentally) nodded along at first; after all there's no shortage of current
authors writing on the topic, placing the work in whatever sort of context one might
imagine as being possibly relevant (and many that are frankly a stretch even for the
stretchy mind).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But then, it turned out they were not actually contrasting dusty old tomes by long-lived,
long-dead, long-white, long-males to spanking new ultra-relevant works complete with
ISBN-13s which the instructor had unfairly discarded due to her irrational love of
the long-everything publications mentioned above. No, the instructor's main beef with
the essays was that a number of the students had made the same rather unusual point,
mostly using a rather unusual turn of phrase, which happened to originate from Wikipedia.
Now I'm not saying that &lt;a href=http://nikhilb.in/nucleus/index.php?itemid=694&gt;Wikipedia
is the devil&lt;/a&gt;, but merely that university students should probably rely on more
than encyclopedias to write their papers. And if they do write their papers mainly
from encyclopedias, they should suffer accordingly. Maybe Wikipedia's authors and
editors are alive, and often young (erm, I'll have to get back to you on the "white
male" business. I have my suspicions), but Wikipedia should hardly be considered as
a primary source (&lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_publisher_of_original_thought&gt;Wikipedia
is not a publisher of original thought&lt;/a&gt;). It might be an entirely reasonable starting
point to get some ideas if you're totally devoid of them, but it's never a good idea
to pass off the ideas, or worse, the words, of Wikipedia as your own. It's particularly
bad if you don't acknowledge the source and are not even clever enough to change the
words around.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Frankly, I'm surprised that university students were caught by Wikipedia in this way,
and they're lucky they were only downgraded instead of being swatted across the room
for incompetent plagiarism. But it must be really terrible for teachers of slightly
younger students, trying to get them to actually read assigned books in this day and
age of instantly available summary information of all kinds. Back in the olden days,
of course, the main way of doing this was through Cliffs Notes [sic?], whose distinctive
cover design marked you out as a cheat from a hundred paces, and which were (allegedly)
kept by most teachers for comparison with unusually insightful essays. Or by re-using
a very good paper from someone else in some other year, possibly changing a few words
here and there to hide the paper's origin (or at worst, just using White-Out to replace
the original author's name with your own). This, however, required access to (a) a
good paper, (b) from someone older, (c) on the right topic, which were seldom available.
The Dunce family library, however, contained a number of highly abridged classic novels,
which I understand were rented out to classmates by &lt;a href=http://brianvinson10.blogspot.com&gt;a
certain relative of mine&lt;/a&gt; for book-report purposes. Shameful indeed. But not as
shameful as university students cutting and pasting from Wikipedia! &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=fffee659-9e85-4573-a372-1acfa835bcf7" /&gt;</description>
      <category>read</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=2a0725a5-149c-4bf1-874f-0e0703e275a6</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,2a0725a5-149c-4bf1-874f-0e0703e275a6.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <font face="Verdana" size="2">Nearly a
year ago, in <a href="http://newpics.org/david/bookSuggestionsAndUnsuggestions.aspx">this
post</a> I extolled the virtues of <a href="http://www.librarything.com">Library Thing</a>,
a site that gives interesting book suggestions (and "unsuggestions") based on statistics
of users' libraries.<br /><br />
Well, we have now finally decided to bite the bullet and start recording the contents
of our own library there as well. I must admit this has become a bit of an obsession
in the Dunce house (who would have thought?!), but there's a long way to go. Despite
the handy options to find books easily (looking up by ISBN using Amazon, Library of
Congress or quite a few other databases) it's still taking us a long time. Mainly
due to UK editions which don't always come up on Amazon or any of the others we've
tried. So we're still working on our first room, the dining room. The main consequence
of this is that cookbooks are relatively over-represented at the moment.<br /><br />
It gives all kinds of interesting information; perhaps the most interesting to us
at the moment is the number of users who have a particular book in their collection
(although this may not be exactly right due to variations in titles, editions etc.
For example I find it extremely hard to believe that only two Libray Thing users have
a copy of <a href="http://www.librarything.com/work/2579609/book/23205235">"Wrestling's
Heels and Heroes"</a>, or that nobody but us has the <a href="http://www.librarything.com/work/4285889/book/23122811">Oxford
Handbook of Psycholinguistics</a>), and also the other books owned by people whose
libraries are similar to ours so far.<br /><br />
Our catalog is visible to public view <a href="http://www.librarything.com/catalog/Dunce">here</a>,
although please note that we have a long, long way to go before it will be complete.
So don't use this as a definitive guide to gift book selection. Especially if the
good book stores near our workplaces keep trying to clear out their second-hand books
(I think we are +5 in the last couple of days for this reason).<br /><br />
Rumors that we are planning to convert the attic into a library are not completely
true.</font>
        <p>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=2a0725a5-149c-4bf1-874f-0e0703e275a6" />
      </body>
      <title>Listing your books online</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,2a0725a5-149c-4bf1-874f-0e0703e275a6.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/ListingYourBooksOnline.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:11:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;font face="Verdana" size="2"&gt;Nearly a year ago, in &lt;a href="http://newpics.org/david/bookSuggestionsAndUnsuggestions.aspx"&gt;this
post&lt;/a&gt; I extolled the virtues of &lt;a href="http://www.librarything.com"&gt;Library Thing&lt;/a&gt;,
a site that gives interesting book suggestions (and "unsuggestions") based on statistics
of users' libraries.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Well, we have now finally decided to bite the bullet and start recording the contents
of our own library there as well. I must admit this has become a bit of an obsession
in the Dunce house (who would have thought?!), but there's a long way to go. Despite
the handy options to find books easily (looking up by ISBN using Amazon, Library of
Congress or quite a few other databases) it's still taking us a long time. Mainly
due to UK editions which don't always come up on Amazon or any of the others we've
tried. So we're still working on our first room, the dining room. The main consequence
of this is that cookbooks are relatively over-represented at the moment.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It gives all kinds of interesting information; perhaps the most interesting to us
at the moment is the number of users who have a particular book in their collection
(although this may not be exactly right due to variations in titles, editions etc.
For example I find it extremely hard to believe that only two Libray Thing users have
a copy of &lt;a href="http://www.librarything.com/work/2579609/book/23205235"&gt;"Wrestling's
Heels and Heroes"&lt;/a&gt;, or that nobody but us has the &lt;a href="http://www.librarything.com/work/4285889/book/23122811"&gt;Oxford
Handbook of Psycholinguistics&lt;/a&gt;), and also the other books owned by people whose
libraries are similar to ours so far.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Our catalog is visible to public view &lt;a href="http://www.librarything.com/catalog/Dunce"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;,
although please note that we have a long, long way to go before it will be complete.
So don't use this as a definitive guide to gift book selection. Especially if the
good book stores near our workplaces keep trying to clear out their second-hand books
(I think we are +5 in the last couple of days for this reason).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Rumors that we are planning to convert the attic into a library are not completely
true.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=2a0725a5-149c-4bf1-874f-0e0703e275a6" /&gt;</description>
      <category>read</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=2afe44c1-cd59-46fe-b1cb-a2fb30b1e9da</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,2afe44c1-cd59-46fe-b1cb-a2fb30b1e9da.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <title>Street furniture</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,2afe44c1-cd59-46fe-b1cb-a2fb30b1e9da.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/StreetFurniture.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:57:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;font face="Verdana" size="2"&gt;This weekend the Dunces said goodbye to a couple of
old friends, two large &lt;a href=http://www.ikea.com /&gt;Ikea&gt; bookshelves (one "Leksvik"
and one who-knows-what) which have been with us for ages and together offered us a
dozen (much-needed) shelves of book storage. Unfortunately as we've moved the shelves
from place to place, their structural integrity has gradually decreased (despite our
efforts to take them apart very carefully, and just as carefully store all the hardware
necessary to rebuild them successfully). And now they can probably be best described
as "wonky"; they are fine if carefully propped in a corner, but tend to slouch if
left to their own devices. But they've been happily slouching in the back bedroom
for some months now, loaded with books and showing no signs of imminent collapse.
Perhaps I've exaggerated their lack of structural integrity (although I'm irritated
by their tendency towards "disposable", like many Ikea products [Sometimes you do
get what you pay for]); the real problem is that they don't really fit anywhere in
our flat. They've remained in our back room just because we've abandoned the room,
leaving it as a disorganized storage area where we hang our clothes to dry, park an
extra bike, and so on.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But now things are changing. Mrs. Dunce is spearheading the effort to make the room
usable, which includes building a set of shelves* from floor to ceiling in a fairly
wide alcove next to the chimney breast. These shelves should have just about as much
capacity as the two bookshelves, and will allow us much more space in the room. So
we dragged the two old shelves outside, leaving them next to the bins in the hope
that someone else might consider them useful and take them away. I didn't think there
was much chance; they looked even more wonky sitting on our crooked pavement in the
front garden. But surprise, surprise, this morning they were gone. So now there's
no going back. We have to build the shelves, or get rid of a dozen cartons of books!** 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
* We should be up to the job of shelf-building, having already completed a small test
run in another room using the same style of shelf mounting.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
** While I was clearing off the old bookshelves, I was also going through the books
with an eye on getting rid of those we didn't need any longer. But I only found a
dozen or so that I could really do without (to give you an idea of my hoarding tendencies, &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=http://www.galaxypress.com//product_info.php?cPath=39&amp;products_id=80&gt;Battlefield
Earth&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; made the cut). So it was hardly worth making an effort to get rid of
any books this time around.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=2afe44c1-cd59-46fe-b1cb-a2fb30b1e9da" /&gt;</description>
      <category>house;read</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=cd4b6408-0cd4-486a-afa5-0ca1c4722de4</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,cd4b6408-0cd4-486a-afa5-0ca1c4722de4.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <font face="Verdana" size="2">
          <b>Q</b> Who
had a beard of burnt up black?<br /><b>A</b> Blackbeard.<br /><br />
I've spent most of the holiday break away from the computer, so it's been a while
since I've posted anything. So imagine my surprise when I checked my access logs and
found zillions of referrals from internet searches for beards. Not only beards but
specifically, those of burnt up black. I immediately discarded the possibility that
the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_community">bear community</a> had launched
some sort of major Christmas publicity effort, and followed the referrals to their
target. Actually, the beard in question is mentioned only in <a href="http://newpics.org/david/NoPhotosHerePleaseMoveAlong.aspx">this
entry</a>, referring to a particular literary work. To which I refer obliquely at
the moment for reasons that will become clear in a bit.<br /><br />
So where did all these references to this literary work come from? I googled the phrase
myself, and quickly found the answer. It's a question in this year's King William's
College Quiz (<a href="http://www.kwc.sch.im/GKP2006.pdf">PDF link</a> from King William's
College site; <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1976624,00.html">html
link</a> from the Guardian). Quizzes like these are quite a British tradition (and
Mannish as well, if that's not covered by the term "British"); this time of year it's
nearly impossible to get through a newspaper without a year-in-review quiz of some
sort, never mind all the pub quizzes out there. But it seems the gentle art of quizzery
has suffered a serious blow thanks to the readily available mountain of information
out there (here!) these days. I've been quite a fan of trivia in my day, and have
a great appreciation for those who are able to retain vast amounts of inconsequential
information (myself included to a limited extent, much more limited when it comes
to British pop culture predating my arrival here [though I have made up ground when
it comes to pop culture of the 21st century]). But now answering quiz-type questions
is very different. Answering a question like the one above now requires little more
than typing it into your friendly search engine (Google, that is: referrals from Google
are occurring more than 30 times as often as all other search engines combined) and
seeing what comes up. Unless, of course, this particular entry appears on your search
results. For Blackbeard is not the correct answer at all, but Svengali (also mentioned
in <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/christmas/article/0,,192516,00.html">KWC's 2000
quiz</a>). Even if a question is written in a manner that prevents searching for the
exact quotation, clever use of search terms (usually not the norm, if my referral
logs are anything to go by) can still often get the answer quite readily. Never mind
people who start compiling their own lists of answers. I was tempted to start compiling
such a list, all with incorrect but acceptable-sounding answers. But then I figured
that having all the wrong answers in one place might be too obvious. So I'll stick
with my old friend alone: Blackbeard and his beard of burnt up black.</font>
        <p>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=cd4b6408-0cd4-486a-afa5-0ca1c4722de4" />
      </body>
      <title>A beard of burnt up black</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,cd4b6408-0cd4-486a-afa5-0ca1c4722de4.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/ABeardOfBurntUpBlack.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 13:36:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;font face="Verdana" size="2"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Q&lt;/b&gt; Who had a beard of burnt up black?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;A&lt;/b&gt; Blackbeard.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I've spent most of the holiday break away from the computer, so it's been a while
since I've posted anything. So imagine my surprise when I checked my access logs and
found zillions of referrals from internet searches for beards. Not only beards but
specifically, those of burnt up black. I immediately discarded the possibility that
the &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_community&gt;bear community&lt;/a&gt; had launched
some sort of major Christmas publicity effort, and followed the referrals to their
target. Actually, the beard in question is mentioned only in &lt;a href=http://newpics.org/david/NoPhotosHerePleaseMoveAlong.aspx&gt;this
entry&lt;/a&gt;, referring to a particular literary work. To which I refer obliquely at
the moment for reasons that will become clear in a bit.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So where did all these references to this literary work come from? I googled the phrase
myself, and quickly found the answer. It's a question in this year's King William's
College Quiz (&lt;a href=http://www.kwc.sch.im/GKP2006.pdf&gt;PDF link&lt;/a&gt; from King William's
College site; &lt;a href=http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1976624,00.html&gt;html link&lt;/a&gt; from
the Guardian). Quizzes like these are quite a British tradition (and Mannish as well,
if that's not covered by the term "British"); this time of year it's nearly impossible
to get through a newspaper without a year-in-review quiz of some sort, never mind
all the pub quizzes out there. But it seems the gentle art of quizzery has suffered
a serious blow thanks to the readily available mountain of information out there (here!)
these days. I've been quite a fan of trivia in my day, and have a great appreciation
for those who are able to retain vast amounts of inconsequential information (myself
included to a limited extent, much more limited when it comes to British pop culture
predating my arrival here [though I have made up ground when it comes to pop culture
of the 21st century]). But now answering quiz-type questions is very different. Answering
a question like the one above now requires little more than typing it into your friendly
search engine (Google, that is: referrals from Google are occurring more than 30 times
as often as all other search engines combined) and seeing what comes up. Unless, of
course, this particular entry appears on your search results. For Blackbeard is not
the correct answer at all, but Svengali (also mentioned in &lt;a href=http://www.guardian.co.uk/christmas/article/0,,192516,00.html&gt;KWC's
2000 quiz&lt;/a&gt;). Even if a question is written in a manner that prevents searching
for the exact quotation, clever use of search terms (usually not the norm, if my referral
logs are anything to go by) can still often get the answer quite readily. Never mind
people who start compiling their own lists of answers. I was tempted to start compiling
such a list, all with incorrect but acceptable-sounding answers. But then I figured
that having all the wrong answers in one place might be too obvious. So I'll stick
with my old friend alone: Blackbeard and his beard of burnt up black.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=cd4b6408-0cd4-486a-afa5-0ca1c4722de4" /&gt;</description>
      <category>meta;read</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=0564b221-a483-401b-8ee7-d94a90480b85</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,0564b221-a483-401b-8ee7-d94a90480b85.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <font face="Verdana" size="2">It's time
for another excellent time-wasting website, brought to my attention by a <a href="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/%7Emyl/languagelog/archives/003897.html">recent
post</a> on the Language Log (title: "If you loved <i>The Chomsky Reader</i>, you'll
hate <i>The Devil Wears Prada</i>"). This one is the <a href="http://www.librarything.com/">Library
Thing</a>, an online book cataloguing system that allows you to see your own collection
in the context of other people's collections (N.B. you can only enter 200 books into
your "collection" for free [no limit: $10/year or $25/life], but 200 is probably a
pretty good start if you have time for it). To me the most interesting aspects of
this site are the <a href="http://www.librarything.com/suggest.php">suggestion/anti-suggestion</a> options.
The suggestion option is similar to Amazon's recommendation system (Amazon recommendations
are also presented in the Library Thing's suggestion page), "People with this book
also have...", based on deviation of actual ownership of a title from the expected
ownership based on popularity.<br /><br />
The suggestion system gives results that look like this for a few of my favorite books
(I've only looked at the level of individual works; I'm a bit too busy to enter in
my own library [or subset thereof]): people who own Neal Stephenson's <i>Snow Crash</i> tend
to own other works by Stephenson, also William Gibson, Bruce Sterling and so on. Just
like me. Owners of Pynchon's <i>Gravity's Rainbow</i> seem to have plenty of other
Pynchon, plus William Gaddis, David Foster Wallace, John Barth, and Richard Powers.
Just like me. <i>Infinite Jest</i> by David Foster Wallace gives more Wallace (not
of IJ quality, I should note), plenty of Pynchon, also Gaddis, Dom DeLillo, Dave Eggers,
Jonathan Franzen (plus Michael Chabon who keeps coming up, I'll have to check him
out). <i>A Confederacy of Dunces</i>, however, brings up some odd results (differing
depending on "v1" vs "v2", a distinction I haven't quite figured out yet*). Top of
the table is Truman Capote's <i>In Cold Blood</i>, followed closely by <i>Gravity's
Rainbow</i> and a slew of Vonnegut titles, but also Faulkner, Joyce, Nabokov, Irving
and Kerouac.<br /><br />
But there's also an anti-suggestion system the unsuggester (people who own X tend
not to own Y): People who own<i>Snow Crash</i> tend not to own Rick Warren's <i>The
Purpose Driven Church</i>, Henri Nouwen's <i>The Wounded Healer: Ministry in Contemporary
Society</i> and Jan Karon's <i>In This Mountain</i>. Owners of <i>Gravity's Rainbow</i> are
very short on Tim LaHaye (7 titles in the top 30 "unrecommended"), John Piper (4 titles),
also missing out on <i>The Other Side of the Story</i> by Marian Keyes and <i>Petals
on the Wind</i> by V.C. Andrews. <i>Infinite Jest</i> readers do not tend to own novels
by James Patterson, Nora Roberts, Tamora Pierce and Dean Koontz (this is the only
exception I've found: I must admit I do have something by Koontz hanging around the
house that has not yet found a suitable home). Finally, <i>A Confederacy of Dunces</i> owners
tend not to have <i>Boy Meets Girl: Say Hello to Courtship</i> by Joshua Harris, and
a mass of books by Sherrilyn Kenyon (seven of the ten unsuggested books).<br /><br /><br />
*The distinction between v1 and v2 is explained in a comment on the LibraryThing blog:
"</font>
        <font face="Verdana" size="2">Basically v2 has the "obscurity knob" turned
up. It care more about the ratio of have/expected than the absolute number of have/expected.
v1 is also massaged a bit to dampen high-popularity low-specificity books (eg., things
you read in High School, like the Crucible)."</font>
        <p>
        </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=0564b221-a483-401b-8ee7-d94a90480b85" />
      </body>
      <title>book suggestions and unsuggestions</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,0564b221-a483-401b-8ee7-d94a90480b85.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/bookSuggestionsAndUnsuggestions.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:13:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;font face="Verdana" size="2"&gt;It's time for another excellent time-wasting website,
brought to my attention by a &lt;a href="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/%7Emyl/languagelog/archives/003897.html"&gt;recent
post&lt;/a&gt; on the Language Log (title: "If you loved &lt;i&gt;The Chomsky Reader&lt;/i&gt;, you'll
hate &lt;i&gt;The Devil Wears Prada&lt;/i&gt;"). This one is the &lt;a href="http://www.librarything.com/"&gt;Library
Thing&lt;/a&gt;, an online book cataloguing system that allows you to see your own collection
in the context of other people's collections (N.B. you can only enter 200 books into
your "collection" for free [no limit: $10/year or $25/life], but 200 is probably a
pretty good start if you have time for it). To me the most interesting aspects of
this site are the &lt;a href="http://www.librarything.com/suggest.php"&gt;suggestion/anti-suggestion&lt;/a&gt; options.
The suggestion option is similar to Amazon's recommendation system (Amazon recommendations
are also presented in the Library Thing's suggestion page), "People with this book
also have...", based on deviation of actual ownership of a title from the expected
ownership based on popularity.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The suggestion system gives results that look like this for a few of my favorite books
(I've only looked at the level of individual works; I'm a bit too busy to enter in
my own library [or subset thereof]): people who own Neal Stephenson's &lt;i&gt;Snow Crash&lt;/i&gt; tend
to own other works by Stephenson, also William Gibson, Bruce Sterling and so on. Just
like me. Owners of Pynchon's &lt;i&gt;Gravity's Rainbow&lt;/i&gt; seem to have plenty of other
Pynchon, plus William Gaddis, David Foster Wallace, John Barth, and Richard Powers.
Just like me. &lt;i&gt;Infinite Jest&lt;/i&gt; by David Foster Wallace gives more Wallace (not
of IJ quality, I should note), plenty of Pynchon, also Gaddis, Dom DeLillo, Dave Eggers,
Jonathan Franzen (plus Michael Chabon who keeps coming up, I'll have to check him
out). &lt;i&gt;A Confederacy of Dunces&lt;/i&gt;, however, brings up some odd results (differing
depending on "v1" vs "v2", a distinction I haven't quite figured out yet*). Top of
the table is Truman Capote's &lt;i&gt;In Cold Blood&lt;/i&gt;, followed closely by &lt;i&gt;Gravity's
Rainbow&lt;/i&gt; and a slew of Vonnegut titles, but also Faulkner, Joyce, Nabokov, Irving
and Kerouac.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But there's also an anti-suggestion system the unsuggester (people who own X tend
not to own Y): People who own&lt;i&gt;Snow Crash&lt;/i&gt; tend not to own Rick Warren's &lt;i&gt;The
Purpose Driven Church&lt;/i&gt;, Henri Nouwen's &lt;i&gt;The Wounded Healer: Ministry in Contemporary
Society&lt;/i&gt; and Jan Karon's &lt;i&gt;In This Mountain&lt;/i&gt;. Owners of &lt;i&gt;Gravity's Rainbow&lt;/i&gt; are
very short on Tim LaHaye (7 titles in the top 30 "unrecommended"), John Piper (4 titles),
also missing out on &lt;i&gt;The Other Side of the Story&lt;/i&gt; by Marian Keyes and &lt;i&gt;Petals
on the Wind&lt;/i&gt; by V.C. Andrews. &lt;i&gt;Infinite Jest&lt;/i&gt; readers do not tend to own novels
by James Patterson, Nora Roberts, Tamora Pierce and Dean Koontz (this is the only
exception I've found: I must admit I do have something by Koontz hanging around the
house that has not yet found a suitable home). Finally, &lt;i&gt;A Confederacy of Dunces&lt;/i&gt; owners
tend not to have &lt;i&gt;Boy Meets Girl: Say Hello to Courtship&lt;/i&gt; by Joshua Harris, and
a mass of books by Sherrilyn Kenyon (seven of the ten unsuggested books).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
*The distinction between v1 and v2 is explained in a comment on the LibraryThing blog:
"&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font face="Verdana" size="2"&gt;Basically v2 has the "obscurity knob" turned
up. It care more about the ratio of have/expected than the absolute number of have/expected.
v1 is also massaged a bit to dampen high-popularity low-specificity books (eg., things
you read in High School, like the Crucible)."&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=0564b221-a483-401b-8ee7-d94a90480b85" /&gt;</description>
      <category>read</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=6406e850-5ede-4a26-bd71-4afb6f74c116</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,6406e850-5ede-4a26-bd71-4afb6f74c116.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <font face="Verdana" size="2">I just went
to the webpage of my <a href="http://kokomotribune.com" />old hometown newspaper.
At the top of the page:<br /><br /><i>Breaking News: Which Sunday Comics are your favorite?</i><br /><br />
It's good to see things haven't changed much around there.<p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=6406e850-5ede-4a26-bd71-4afb6f74c116" /></font>
      </body>
      <title>Breaking News!</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,6406e850-5ede-4a26-bd71-4afb6f74c116.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/BreakingNews.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:47:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;font face="Verdana" size="2"&gt;I just went to the webpage of my &lt;a href=http://kokomotribune.com /&gt;old
hometown newspaper&gt;. At the top of the page:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Breaking News: Which Sunday Comics are your favorite?&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It's good to see things haven't changed much around there.&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=6406e850-5ede-4a26-bd71-4afb6f74c116" /&gt;</description>
      <category>read</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=1c79d0e7-0eed-4224-a833-48880dca3074</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,1c79d0e7-0eed-4224-a833-48880dca3074.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <font size="2">An ongoing series about my love of books.<br /><br />
As I don't recall at all, I started reading at a very early age (surely quite impaired
by my terrible vision, as I didn't have glasses yet). There were stacks and stacks
of books of all sorts in our house (a TV-free zone, although I vaguely remember an
unused TV hanging around in the basement), and I know I was an avid reader from the
beginning. The first book I actually remember reading today was <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0394800206/002-3971987-7980837?v=glance&amp;n=283155"><i>Go,
Dog, Go!</i></a>. I thought it was hysterically funny to see the pictures of wild
dogs wearing hip duds and driving fast cars towards some sort of dog-only Woodstock-in-a-giant-tree
really kept my interest, and I always wished I could some day go to a similar party
in a tree.<br /><br />
I also really liked to read my father's <a href="http://www.igopogo.com/we_have_met.htm">Pogo</a> books,
although for some reason I failed to recognize <b>any</b> of the references to the
Nixon administration, or to any other historical figures for that matter. To me they
were just some unusual comics about a group of rural, swamp-dwelling animals who got
into various comic antics as they floated around the swamp in flat-bottomed boats
(e.g. the poor alligator who was always suspected of eating other characters. Sometimes
justly as I vaguely recall).<br /><br />
I was also a fan of joke books from a very young age, and ran into certain problems
as I was keen to pass on these jokes even when I didn't quite understand what they
were about. One of the few examples I can remember falls into this category, and is
also an excellent indicator of the historical period I'm talking about (it's also
just as funny today as it was then!):<br />
Q: What's giant, purple and swims in the ocean?<br />
A: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moby_Grape">Moby Grape</a>!<br />
I think I also caused some inadvertent household controversy when I came across a
really unusual and funny joke book the likes of which I'd never seen before. It definitely
belonged to my father (a fan of subtle, intelligent humor of all sorts). I can still
clearly remember the one I proudly told to my mother:<br />
"Mommy, mommy, can we go for a ride?"<br />
"Shut up, your iron lung won't fit in the Volkswagen."<br />
For some reason, she didn't think it was very funny. And the next time I went to the
high shelf to look for the joke book, it had disappeared. Must have gotten lost or
something. In my teenage years I amassed quite a collection of sick joke books (mostly
in the "Truly Tasteless Jokes" series), but they had a similarly unfortunate tendency
to evaporate into thin air, even when stashed in fairly secure hiding places.<br /><br />
Unfortunately, my joke-book-reading tendencies were to a large extent inspired by
reading various fictional tales of comedically-blessed, precocious children who always
managed to have a giant circle of friends and were constantly the center of attention
with their wise-cracking antics. I usually found myself in very diffferent circumstances,
and drew the unfortunate conclusion that I just hadn't yet found the right jokes to
draw the crowds. So (with the aid of a healthy "humor" section in the public library),
I worked my way through the various genres without success. Knock-knock jokes just
didn't sit well with anyone (thank goodness I didn't completely remember the one from
the above-mentioned disappearing joke book: "Knock, knock"; "Who's there?"; "Nazis";
"Nazis who?"; [and the punchline was something to do with Anne Frank. I'm sure that
would have gone down a treat with the under-10 audience]), nor did riddles, cross
jokes (there are more than 90,000 Google hits for <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;q=%22what+do+you+get+when+you+cross+a+*+with+a%22">"what
do you get when you cross a * with a")</a>), light bulb jokes (would you believe 295,000
Google hits for <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;q=%22what+do+you+get+when+you+cross+a+*+with+a%22">"how
many * does it take to change a light bulb"</a>?!), puns, funny headlines, shaggy
dog stories, and don't even get me started on limericks (Very underappreciated by
elementary school teachers, I should say. Especially if they feature <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nantucket">islands
south of Cape Cod</a>). </font>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=1c79d0e7-0eed-4224-a833-48880dca3074" />
      </body>
      <title>books and me: Humor</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,1c79d0e7-0eed-4224-a833-48880dca3074.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/booksAndMeHumor.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 13:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;font size="2"&gt;An ongoing series about my love of books.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As I don't recall at all, I started reading at a very early age (surely quite impaired
by my terrible vision, as I didn't have glasses yet). There were stacks and stacks
of books of all sorts in our house (a TV-free zone, although I vaguely remember an
unused TV hanging around in the basement), and I know I was an avid reader from the
beginning. The first book I actually remember reading today was &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0394800206/002-3971987-7980837?v=glance&amp;amp;n=283155"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Go,
Dog, Go!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. I thought it was hysterically funny to see the pictures of wild
dogs wearing hip duds and driving fast cars towards some sort of dog-only Woodstock-in-a-giant-tree
really kept my interest, and I always wished I could some day go to a similar party
in a tree.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I also really liked to read my father's &lt;a href="http://www.igopogo.com/we_have_met.htm"&gt;Pogo&lt;/a&gt; books,
although for some reason I failed to recognize &lt;b&gt;any&lt;/b&gt; of the references to the
Nixon administration, or to any other historical figures for that matter. To me they
were just some unusual comics about a group of rural, swamp-dwelling animals who got
into various comic antics as they floated around the swamp in flat-bottomed boats
(e.g. the poor alligator who was always suspected of eating other characters. Sometimes
justly as I vaguely recall).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I was also a fan of joke books from a very young age, and ran into certain problems
as I was keen to pass on these jokes even when I didn't quite understand what they
were about. One of the few examples I can remember falls into this category, and is
also an excellent indicator of the historical period I'm talking about (it's also
just as funny today as it was then!):&lt;br&gt;
Q: What's giant, purple and swims in the ocean?&lt;br&gt;
A: &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moby_Grape"&gt;Moby Grape&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;br&gt;
I think I also caused some inadvertent household controversy when I came across a
really unusual and funny joke book the likes of which I'd never seen before. It definitely
belonged to my father (a fan of subtle, intelligent humor of all sorts). I can still
clearly remember the one I proudly told to my mother:&lt;br&gt;
"Mommy, mommy, can we go for a ride?"&lt;br&gt;
"Shut up, your iron lung won't fit in the Volkswagen."&lt;br&gt;
For some reason, she didn't think it was very funny. And the next time I went to the
high shelf to look for the joke book, it had disappeared. Must have gotten lost or
something. In my teenage years I amassed quite a collection of sick joke books (mostly
in the "Truly Tasteless Jokes" series), but they had a similarly unfortunate tendency
to evaporate into thin air, even when stashed in fairly secure hiding places.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Unfortunately, my joke-book-reading tendencies were to a large extent inspired by
reading various fictional tales of comedically-blessed, precocious children who always
managed to have a giant circle of friends and were constantly the center of attention
with their wise-cracking antics. I usually found myself in very diffferent circumstances,
and drew the unfortunate conclusion that I just hadn't yet found the right jokes to
draw the crowds. So (with the aid of a healthy "humor" section in the public library),
I worked my way through the various genres without success. Knock-knock jokes just
didn't sit well with anyone (thank goodness I didn't completely remember the one from
the above-mentioned disappearing joke book: "Knock, knock"; "Who's there?"; "Nazis";
"Nazis who?"; [and the punchline was something to do with Anne Frank. I'm sure that
would have gone down a treat with the under-10 audience]), nor did riddles, cross
jokes (there are more than 90,000 Google hits for &lt;a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=%22what+do+you+get+when+you+cross+a+*+with+a%22"&gt;"what
do you get when you cross a * with a")&lt;/a&gt;), light bulb jokes (would you believe 295,000
Google hits for &lt;a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=%22what+do+you+get+when+you+cross+a+*+with+a%22"&gt;"how
many * does it take to change a light bulb"&lt;/a&gt;?!), puns, funny headlines, shaggy
dog stories, and don't even get me started on limericks (Very underappreciated by
elementary school teachers, I should say. Especially if they feature &gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nantucket"&gt;islands
south of Cape Cod&lt;/a&gt;). &lt;/font&gt;&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=1c79d0e7-0eed-4224-a833-48880dca3074" /&gt;</description>
      <category>read</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=b4b827de-c6cc-4b0d-9b18-660814dab5bb</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,b4b827de-c6cc-4b0d-9b18-660814dab5bb.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <font face="Verdana" size="2">I've neglected writing about reading too long on this
blog, especially since I'm such a book fanatic. Today starts a series of posts about
me and books (although we'll see how long I stick to the idea). I'll start with a
snapshot of the current moment when it comes to reading.<br /><br />
In general, the amount of time I spend reading is inversely proportional to the amount
of time I spend cycling. This is especially related to my commute (it's very easy
to read on the bus, and very difficult to read on the bike). Lately I've been riding
a lot, so I've been reading much less. Not to say I haven't been reading; my most
recent books are as follows:<br /><br />
David Lee Roth's autobiography, <i>Crazy from the Heat</i>. I'm not much of a musician/memoir
reader; this one was lent to me by a friend and served an excellent role as toilet
reading. In general, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/0786889470/ref=cm_cr_dp_2_1/002-3971987-7980837?%5Fencoding=UTF8&amp;customer-reviews.sort%5Fby=-SubmissionDate&amp;n=283155">Amazon
reviewers</a> thought this book was wonderful (average rating: 4.5/5 stars). I found
it shockingly incoherent and full of Mr. Roth's giant ego (I must admit, occasionally
amusing). It was apparently edited down from thousands of pages; I can't imagine what
it was like before the editing process. However, this made it ideal as a toilet read:
as the tales he relates don't seem to be in any particular order, and tend to fade
from one tale into the next without resolution, one need not adjust the duration of
one's transactions to correspond with chapters, narrative units, etc.<br /><br />
Iain Sinclair's <i>Lights Out for the Territory</i>. An excellent counterpoint to
the Roth biography which I read in more public places. This one also contains its
share of incoherent ramblings, but they're all inspired by Sinclair's psychogeopgraphical
journeys around London, and it's full of interesting London characters, obscure locations,
objects and events which together make up a sort of London mythology. Each of the
sections follows the author on a hike in London, and no detail is too minor to set
him off on a string of associations about the area, its people, its mood, and how
all of them may have changed as time goes by. His approach to exploring the area resonates
with me quite a bit, although my inclinations toward interpretation are substantially
less grandiose. (<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/1862070091/ref=cm_cr_dp_pt/002-3971987-7980837?%5Fencoding=UTF8&amp;n=283155&amp;s=books">Amazon
reviews</a>: average 4/5 stars)<br /><br />
David Foster Wallace's <i>Consider the Lobster and other essays</i>. I'm a huge fan
of DFW, whose <i>Infinite Jest</i> is one of my favorite books of all time. His short
stories, on the other hand, have been largely disappointing (and let's not even go
into <i>Everything and More: A Compact History of Infinity</i> which is infuriating
in its unholy union of chatty ramblings about like the greatest math teacher ever
and just how cool he was, and (fairly) well put together mathematical content), and
I found his previous book of essays <i>A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again</i> mixed:
I really really enjoyed the title essay, in which DFW recounts a decidedly unfun experience
on a luxury cruise, and also his account of visiting the Illinois State Fair [featuring
an incident of overeating sufficiently severe to require medical attention], but others
on more highbrow sujects were less memorable/interesting. The same can be said about
this one: the essays I enjoyed most were those that revolved around DFW's personal
experiences in various situations (Adult Video News awards ceremony; traveling on
the John McCain bus during his 2000 Presidential campaign; watching the events of
Sept 11 2001 with neighbors in Bloomington, IL). There was also an excellent piece
on Tracy Austin's autobiography and how unsatisfied DFW was with its lack of meaningful
content (mirroring my own complaints about the massive number of interviews with successful
ath(a)letes who just go on and on about doing it for the team, and sucking it up when
the heat's on, and giving 110%, and just pulling together like a unit and getting
things done, ad infinitum). The title piece was written for Gourmet magazine about
the Maine Lobster Festival, and had DFW's characteristic interesting observations
about the event itself, before mutating into DFW's opinions about the ethics of lobster
preparation and so on (yawn... I've read more of this sort of stuff than I care to
acknowledge, and it feels like more of an individual decision at this level). An assortment
of hifalutin articles that I sorta skipped over (Dostoevsky, Kafka), and an essay
about correct English language usage which has had the fur flying for quite a while
(for example, see Language Hat's post <a href="http://www.languagehat.com/languages.php">"David
Foster Wallace Demolished"</a> [scroll down]; google <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;q=snoot+wallace&amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;meta=">snoot
wallace</a> if you want to read more about this particular topic. I have a few opinions
on the subject myself but have run out of time to say much for now). Oh yeah, I have
to mention the final essay in the book. It was a reasonably-decent discussion of talk
radio in the US (and why it's like it is), terribly, terribly marred by inline "footnotes"
in boxes (not necessarily corresponding to their narrative location) which broke up
the text, were connected to their relevant section by arrows (and sometimes multiple
arrows). It was just about impossible to read, a shame because the content was quite
good (why? why? why not just stick with standard footnoting, with which DFW is quite
well acquainted I can assure you. Apparently when it originally appeared in <i>The
Atlantic</i> the notes were formatted in a more agreeable and readable way.).<br /><br />
So that's what I've just read now. Next time, some influential books or events involving
books from my youth. </font>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=b4b827de-c6cc-4b0d-9b18-660814dab5bb" />
      </body>
      <title>A little about books</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,b4b827de-c6cc-4b0d-9b18-660814dab5bb.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/ALittleAboutBooks.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:30:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;font face="Verdana" size="2"&gt;I've neglected writing about reading too long on this
blog, especially since I'm such a book fanatic. Today starts a series of posts about
me and books (although we'll see how long I stick to the idea). I'll start with a
snapshot of the current moment when it comes to reading.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In general, the amount of time I spend reading is inversely proportional to the amount
of time I spend cycling. This is especially related to my commute (it's very easy
to read on the bus, and very difficult to read on the bike). Lately I've been riding
a lot, so I've been reading much less. Not to say I haven't been reading; my most
recent books are as follows:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
David Lee Roth's autobiography, &lt;i&gt;Crazy from the Heat&lt;/i&gt;. I'm not much of a musician/memoir
reader; this one was lent to me by a friend and served an excellent role as toilet
reading. In general, &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/0786889470/ref=cm_cr_dp_2_1/002-3971987-7980837?%5Fencoding=UTF8&amp;amp;customer-reviews.sort%5Fby=-SubmissionDate&amp;amp;n=283155"&gt;Amazon
reviewers&lt;/a&gt; thought this book was wonderful (average rating: 4.5/5 stars). I found
it shockingly incoherent and full of Mr. Roth's giant ego (I must admit, occasionally
amusing). It was apparently edited down from thousands of pages; I can't imagine what
it was like before the editing process. However, this made it ideal as a toilet read:
as the tales he relates don't seem to be in any particular order, and tend to fade
from one tale into the next without resolution, one need not adjust the duration of
one's transactions to correspond with chapters, narrative units, etc.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Iain Sinclair's &lt;i&gt;Lights Out for the Territory&lt;/i&gt;. An excellent counterpoint to
the Roth biography which I read in more public places. This one also contains its
share of incoherent ramblings, but they're all inspired by Sinclair's psychogeopgraphical
journeys around London, and it's full of interesting London characters, obscure locations,
objects and events which together make up a sort of London mythology. Each of the
sections follows the author on a hike in London, and no detail is too minor to set
him off on a string of associations about the area, its people, its mood, and how
all of them may have changed as time goes by. His approach to exploring the area resonates
with me quite a bit, although my inclinations toward interpretation are substantially
less grandiose. (&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/1862070091/ref=cm_cr_dp_pt/002-3971987-7980837?%5Fencoding=UTF8&amp;amp;n=283155&amp;amp;s=books"&gt;Amazon
reviews&lt;/a&gt;: average 4/5 stars)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
David Foster Wallace's &lt;i&gt;Consider the Lobster and other essays&lt;/i&gt;. I'm a huge fan
of DFW, whose &lt;i&gt;Infinite Jest&lt;/i&gt; is one of my favorite books of all time. His short
stories, on the other hand, have been largely disappointing (and let's not even go
into &lt;i&gt;Everything and More: A Compact History of Infinity&lt;/i&gt; which is infuriating
in its unholy union of chatty ramblings about like the greatest math teacher ever
and just how cool he was, and (fairly) well put together mathematical content), and
I found his previous book of essays &lt;i&gt;A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again&lt;/i&gt; mixed:
I really really enjoyed the title essay, in which DFW recounts a decidedly unfun experience
on a luxury cruise, and also his account of visiting the Illinois State Fair [featuring
an incident of overeating sufficiently severe to require medical attention], but others
on more highbrow sujects were less memorable/interesting. The same can be said about
this one: the essays I enjoyed most were those that revolved around DFW's personal
experiences in various situations (Adult Video News awards ceremony; traveling on
the John McCain bus during his 2000 Presidential campaign; watching the events of
Sept 11 2001 with neighbors in Bloomington, IL). There was also an excellent piece
on Tracy Austin's autobiography and how unsatisfied DFW was with its lack of meaningful
content (mirroring my own complaints about the massive number of interviews with successful
ath(a)letes who just go on and on about doing it for the team, and sucking it up when
the heat's on, and giving 110%, and just pulling together like a unit and getting
things done, ad infinitum). The title piece was written for Gourmet magazine about
the Maine Lobster Festival, and had DFW's characteristic interesting observations
about the event itself, before mutating into DFW's opinions about the ethics of lobster
preparation and so on (yawn... I've read more of this sort of stuff than I care to
acknowledge, and it feels like more of an individual decision at this level). An assortment
of hifalutin articles that I sorta skipped over (Dostoevsky, Kafka), and an essay
about correct English language usage which has had the fur flying for quite a while
(for example, see Language Hat's post &lt;a href="http://www.languagehat.com/languages.php"&gt;"David
Foster Wallace Demolished"&lt;/a&gt; [scroll down]; google &lt;a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=snoot+wallace&amp;amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;amp;meta="&gt;snoot
wallace&lt;/a&gt; if you want to read more about this particular topic. I have a few opinions
on the subject myself but have run out of time to say much for now). Oh yeah, I have
to mention the final essay in the book. It was a reasonably-decent discussion of talk
radio in the US (and why it's like it is), terribly, terribly marred by inline "footnotes"
in boxes (not necessarily corresponding to their narrative location) which broke up
the text, were connected to their relevant section by arrows (and sometimes multiple
arrows). It was just about impossible to read, a shame because the content was quite
good (why? why? why not just stick with standard footnoting, with which DFW is quite
well acquainted I can assure you. Apparently when it originally appeared in &lt;i&gt;The
Atlantic&lt;/i&gt; the notes were formatted in a more agreeable and readable way.).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So that's what I've just read now. Next time, some influential books or events involving
books from my youth. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=b4b827de-c6cc-4b0d-9b18-660814dab5bb" /&gt;</description>
      <category>read</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=35ff9fbc-05f9-4786-916d-666522af4f60</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,35ff9fbc-05f9-4786-916d-666522af4f60.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <font face="Verdana" size="2">Yesterday we came home to discover that a handwritten
(photocopied) poem had been anonymously pushed through our mail slot. I'll post it
below without commentary, criticism, or pretentious drivel (but feel free to add those
yourself in the comments if you feel so inclined).<br /><br />
(untitled)<br />
----------------------------------------<br /><b>SERVICE RENOWATION AND<br />
BOLDING<br />
-PAINTING, CARPET, LINOLEUM<br />
BRICKLAYING, KLIN GARDEN<br />
LEYBERS, RABISH TEKE<br />
AWEY, PLASTERS MEN!<br />
07849471769 (PAWEL)<br />
07851411483 (RAFEL)</b><br /><br />
----------------------------------------<br />
The numbers in lines 7 and 8 are UK mobile telephone numbers, and were written in
a very nonstandard form for the UK: loopy nines, crossed sevens, fours that looked
more like lightning bolts and ones that looked more like lambdas. </font>
        <br />
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=35ff9fbc-05f9-4786-916d-666522af4f60" />
      </body>
      <title>Poetry delivered to our door</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,35ff9fbc-05f9-4786-916d-666522af4f60.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/PoetryDeliveredToOurDoor.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:23:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;font face="Verdana" size="2"&gt;Yesterday we came home to discover that a handwritten
(photocopied) poem had been anonymously pushed through our mail slot. I'll post it
below without commentary, criticism, or pretentious drivel (but feel free to add those
yourself in the comments if you feel so inclined).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(untitled)&lt;br&gt;
----------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;SERVICE RENOWATION AND&lt;br&gt;
BOLDING&lt;br&gt;
-PAINTING, CARPET, LINOLEUM&lt;br&gt;
BRICKLAYING, KLIN GARDEN&lt;br&gt;
LEYBERS, RABISH TEKE&lt;br&gt;
AWEY, PLASTERS MEN!&lt;br&gt;
07849471769 (PAWEL)&lt;br&gt;
07851411483 (RAFEL)&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
----------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;
The numbers in lines 7 and 8 are UK mobile telephone numbers, and were written in
a very nonstandard form for the UK: loopy nines, crossed sevens, fours that looked
more like lightning bolts and ones that looked more like lambdas. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=35ff9fbc-05f9-4786-916d-666522af4f60" /&gt;</description>
      <category>read</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=02620d3e-22cc-4107-b648-83f9f6643f30</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,02620d3e-22cc-4107-b648-83f9f6643f30.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <font face="Verdana" size="2">I've always been someone who keeps my eye on the ground
looking for interesting things that have been dropped or abandoned by others. When
I was very young I read a storybook about a little old man who had once found some
money on the ground. He spent the rest of his life looking down at the ground, eventually
becoming permanently hunched over, and never seeing the pretty things like sunsets,
rainbows, birds, trees, clouds and so on. In other words, the moral was that you should
look up and not down. Even as a child I had a very curmudgeonly response to this,
after all, he FOUND MONEY ON THE GROUND!! And probably found A LOT MORE in the rest
of his life, along with other great stuff. Perhaps I was sensitive to this issue due
to my own downward-looking tendencies, but I felt that spending at least some time
looking downwards was an entirely valid lifestyle. Not only can you find great stuff
(aforementioned MONEY, bottle caps, colored glass, used-up lighters, nuts and bolts,
old keys, etc. etc.) but a lowered gaze is a good way to avoid aggressive reactions
from nonhuman primates and bullies (whether human or non-). And I have found some
great stuff in my day, without a hint of scoliosis (AND I've managed to see my share
of sunsets, rainbows, even eclipses and meteor showers which weren't even mentioned
by the silly author I mention above). I should insert here the time-worn phrase "One
man's trash is another man's treasure" which is the only way I can really justify
the hundreds (if not thousands) of rusty bottle caps that we collected over a number
of years. And to be honest, I can't really think of anything that would be universally
judged as a "great find" (when I say "universally" I only mean "among friends, family,
acquaintances and others who might read this entry"). But fortunately this new-fangled
innernet thing has revealed a community of like individuals, (perhaps) centered around <a href="http://www.foundmagazine.com" />FOUND
Magazine (<i>"We collect FOUND stuff: love letters, birthday cards, kids' homework,
to-do lists, ticket stubs, poetry on napkins, telephone bills, doodles - anything
that gives a glimpse into someone else's life."</i>). And yesterday I found something
that would certainly qualify for FOUND Magazine (in fact I shall be sending them the
original). It was a page of hand-written text, reproduced below (as written, including
formatting as best I can without scanning it in). I think it's a plan we all should
follow. Fortunately the 'new' items are only vaguely specified and can be sold in
numerous locations. Internet.<br /><br /><br />
**********************************************<br /><b>Where do I want us to be?<br /><br />
-- Renovate French property with some land (pref. with own water supply and woodland.)<br /><br />
-- Retain London flat - rent out in short term, use as London 'base' in long term.<br /><br />
-- Use French 'base' for workshop to create 'new' items, renovate, reuse to sell in
London, Bath, Cambridge, etc. Possibly also Paris in the medium term. Internet.<br /><br />
-- Grow some food, plant fruit, nut trees. Evolve bottling etc. mainly for ourselves
but possible sideline business.<br /><br /><u>'Issues'</u><br /><br />
-- Language<br /><br />
-- May (will?) need to raise a mortgage (let to buy)<br /><br />
-- Complicated accounts / tax / pensions position</b></font>
        <br />
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=02620d3e-22cc-4107-b648-83f9f6643f30" />
      </body>
      <title>Found!</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,02620d3e-22cc-4107-b648-83f9f6643f30.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/Found.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:40:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;font face="Verdana" size="2"&gt;I've always been someone who keeps my eye on the ground
looking for interesting things that have been dropped or abandoned by others. When
I was very young I read a storybook about a little old man who had once found some
money on the ground. He spent the rest of his life looking down at the ground, eventually
becoming permanently hunched over, and never seeing the pretty things like sunsets,
rainbows, birds, trees, clouds and so on. In other words, the moral was that you should
look up and not down. Even as a child I had a very curmudgeonly response to this,
after all, he FOUND MONEY ON THE GROUND!! And probably found A LOT MORE in the rest
of his life, along with other great stuff. Perhaps I was sensitive to this issue due
to my own downward-looking tendencies, but I felt that spending at least some time
looking downwards was an entirely valid lifestyle. Not only can you find great stuff
(aforementioned MONEY, bottle caps, colored glass, used-up lighters, nuts and bolts,
old keys, etc. etc.) but a lowered gaze is a good way to avoid aggressive reactions
from nonhuman primates and bullies (whether human or non-). And I have found some
great stuff in my day, without a hint of scoliosis (AND I've managed to see my share
of sunsets, rainbows, even eclipses and meteor showers which weren't even mentioned
by the silly author I mention above). I should insert here the time-worn phrase "One
man's trash is another man's treasure" which is the only way I can really justify
the hundreds (if not thousands) of rusty bottle caps that we collected over a number
of years. And to be honest, I can't really think of anything that would be universally
judged as a "great find" (when I say "universally" I only mean "among friends, family,
acquaintances and others who might read this entry"). But fortunately this new-fangled
innernet thing has revealed a community of like individuals, (perhaps) centered around &lt;a href=http://www.foundmagazine.com /&gt;FOUND
Magazine&gt; (&lt;i&gt;"We collect FOUND stuff: love letters, birthday cards, kids' homework,
to-do lists, ticket stubs, poetry on napkins, telephone bills, doodles - anything
that gives a glimpse into someone else's life."&lt;/i&gt;). And yesterday I found something
that would certainly qualify for FOUND Magazine (in fact I shall be sending them the
original). It was a page of hand-written text, reproduced below (as written, including
formatting as best I can without scanning it in). I think it's a plan we all should
follow. Fortunately the 'new' items are only vaguely specified and can be sold in
numerous locations. Internet.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
**********************************************&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Where do I want us to be?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
-- Renovate French property with some land (pref. with own water supply and woodland.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
-- Retain London flat - rent out in short term, use as London 'base' in long term.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
-- Use French 'base' for workshop to create 'new' items, renovate, reuse to sell in
London, Bath, Cambridge, etc. Possibly also Paris in the medium term. Internet.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
-- Grow some food, plant fruit, nut trees. Evolve bottling etc. mainly for ourselves
but possible sideline business.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;u&gt;'Issues'&lt;/u&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
-- Language&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
-- May (will?) need to raise a mortgage (let to buy)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
-- Complicated accounts / tax / pensions position&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=02620d3e-22cc-4107-b648-83f9f6643f30" /&gt;</description>
      <category>read</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=bca98722-aa0c-4783-afa3-aa959121749b</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,bca98722-aa0c-4783-afa3-aa959121749b.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
        </p>
        <font size="2">An awful lot of the blogs I read on a regular or semi-regular basis
are on Blogspot (now run by Google). One of them features a <a href="http://www.blogger.com/redirect/next_blogspot.pyra">"Random
blog" link</a> which sends the clicker off to a mystery blog selected (apparently)
at random from the whole mess. And mess it is: I followed it a couple of times and
was a bit disturbed to find so many "spam blogs" among them.<br /><br />
They're quite easy to spot; their typical content is something like this:<br /><br /><i>Art And Craft Ideas Corks -<br /><br />
Art And Craft Ideas Corks Your ultimate art and craft ideas corks resource. Craft
- Art And Craft Ideas Corks Sponsors Search the Directory: Results For 'art and craft
ideas corks' Add Your Site Directory Listings1.Arts and Crafts IdeasRequest your free
issue of Creative Home Arts Magazine today. Packed with creative arts and craft ideas,
scrapbooking tips and projects from cover to cover. No st..<br /><br />
posted by *****fazscom at 8:46 AM 0 comments 
<br />
Craft Ideas Corks -<br /><br />
Craft Ideas Corks Your ultimate craft ideas corks resource. Craft - Craft Ideas Corks
Sponsors Search the Directory: Results For 'craft ideas corks' Add Your Site Directory
Listings1.Craft Ideas - Bargain PricesShop fast. Buy smart. Shopzilla for Craft Ideas
at over 50,000 Online Stores. Every product from every store means you get a Bargain
Price. Don't just shop, Shopzilla.www.shopzilla.com2.C..<br /><br />
posted by *****fazscom at 8:31 AM 0 comments </i><br /><br />
Their names often contain random letter stings (e.g. fazscom), and/or product names
(e.g. towelsite), and/or numbers, usually have no customization, and the default links
still appear:<br />
* Google News<br />
* Edit-Me<br />
* Edit-Me<br /><br />
These spamblogs are (I guess) intended to boost Google rankings of their underlying
site (see <a href="http://www.geektronica.com/2005-06-30-the-strange-world-of-blogspot-spam-blogs">this
article</a> for an interesting analysis and comment-discussion), perhaps in a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigritude_ultramarine">nigritude
ultramarine</a> sort of way, or else trick browsers into visiting their site. To a
large extent they seem automatically generated (although I guess human intervention
is now required in order to create a blog). I wondered how common such blogs are within
the Blogspot sphere, so I did a little experiment with the <a href="http://www.blogger.com/redirect/next_blogspot.pyra">random
blog link</a>. I clicked it 100 times to see what came up (discounting any repetitions
that occurred, if any). Of course I have no way of knowing that the sample is random,
but this gives an impression of the proportion of spamblogs out there.<br /><br />
Of the 100 tests, 39 of them were spamblogs (including the following "themes": Adult,
Ammunition, Australia travel, Belts, Broker Mortgage, Cells, Christian dating, College,
Cosmetic x2, Craft, Credit, Diaper, Disease sites, Fashion, Football, Healthcare products,
Home Builder, Laser hair removal, Line of credit, Mortgage x2, Notes, Paris travel,
Pasadena travel, Plus size, Pottery, Reality TV, Recipe, Sports Supplement, Stock,
Tennessee, Tools, Transportation, Used treadmills, plus four miscellaneous junk sites
with various content but clearly of a spam blog type). 
<br /><br />
The 61 "real" blogs were of various quality (including 10 blogs with only a single
post more than a month old, but which were noticeably written by humans. Usually to
say "Like everyone else I know, I am going to start blogging now, and this is my blog").
But this gives me a rough estimate of the proportion of blogspot blogs that are spammy,
call it 40%. Is this a problem? I'm not sure, as the only way I come across them is
by the random search, or occasionally they will turn up when I search blogs using <a href="http://www.technorati.com" />Technorati (but
it's quite clear that they are spammy; I need not follow a link to <i>"Weight Loss
Plans Weight Loss Plans Information About Weight Loss Plans click on this link to
discover how good nutrition can help with dieting and weight lossNutrition advice
Atkins Diet Best Fat Burners Cabbage Soup Diet Calories Counting Calories Diabetes
Diet Diabetic Diet Diet Pills Diet Pill"</i> when I am looking for a [real] blog that
discusses "cabbage soup" [I somehow doubt I would take this route, however, with <a href="http://www.epicurious.com" />Epicurious just
around the corner]). Surely they must be useful in some way to the designers; I'm
just not sure how.<br /><br />
Although I didn't spend any time reading the "real" blogs that jumped out at me, I
have to mention the blog of celticwanderlust, whose last entry happened to refer to
our next holiday destination (just a few days): <i>No, the Germans haven't bombed
London again. It's much, much worse. The British have invaded Tallinn!!! Stag parties
are terrorising this town, holding it hostage with there need to to be drunk, naked
and loud all at the same time! I became used to this when the british invaded dublin
(as if 900 years wasn't enough) and destroyed our pub and club culture....</i><br /><br />
We'll have to see if we manage to avoid the invasion; we're mostly after history and
food (and definitely not being simultaneously drunk, naked and loud). </font>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=bca98722-aa0c-4783-afa3-aa959121749b" />
      </body>
      <title>Real blogs and spamblogs</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,bca98722-aa0c-4783-afa3-aa959121749b.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/RealBlogsAndSpamblogs.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:51:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;font size="2"&gt;An awful lot of the blogs I read on a regular or semi-regular basis
are on Blogspot (now run by Google). One of them features a &lt;a href=http://www.blogger.com/redirect/next_blogspot.pyra&gt;"Random
blog" link&lt;/a&gt; which sends the clicker off to a mystery blog selected (apparently)
at random from the whole mess. And mess it is: I followed it a couple of times and
was a bit disturbed to find so many "spam blogs" among them.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
They're quite easy to spot; their typical content is something like this:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Art And Craft Ideas Corks -&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Art And Craft Ideas Corks Your ultimate art and craft ideas corks resource. Craft
- Art And Craft Ideas Corks Sponsors Search the Directory: Results For 'art and craft
ideas corks' Add Your Site Directory Listings1.Arts and Crafts IdeasRequest your free
issue of Creative Home Arts Magazine today. Packed with creative arts and craft ideas,
scrapbooking tips and projects from cover to cover. No st..&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
posted by *****fazscom at 8:46 AM 0 comments 
&lt;br&gt;
Craft Ideas Corks -&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Craft Ideas Corks Your ultimate craft ideas corks resource. Craft - Craft Ideas Corks
Sponsors Search the Directory: Results For 'craft ideas corks' Add Your Site Directory
Listings1.Craft Ideas - Bargain PricesShop fast. Buy smart. Shopzilla for Craft Ideas
at over 50,000 Online Stores. Every product from every store means you get a Bargain
Price. Don't just shop, Shopzilla.www.shopzilla.com2.C..&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
posted by *****fazscom at 8:31 AM 0 comments &lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Their names often contain random letter stings (e.g. fazscom), and/or product names
(e.g. towelsite), and/or numbers, usually have no customization, and the default links
still appear:&lt;br&gt;
* Google News&lt;br&gt;
* Edit-Me&lt;br&gt;
* Edit-Me&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
These spamblogs are (I guess) intended to boost Google rankings of their underlying
site (see &lt;a href=http://www.geektronica.com/2005-06-30-the-strange-world-of-blogspot-spam-blogs&gt;this
article&lt;/a&gt; for an interesting analysis and comment-discussion), perhaps in a &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigritude_ultramarine&gt;nigritude
ultramarine&lt;/a&gt; sort of way, or else trick browsers into visiting their site. To a
large extent they seem automatically generated (although I guess human intervention
is now required in order to create a blog). I wondered how common such blogs are within
the Blogspot sphere, so I did a little experiment with the &lt;a href=http://www.blogger.com/redirect/next_blogspot.pyra&gt;random
blog link&lt;/a&gt;. I clicked it 100 times to see what came up (discounting any repetitions
that occurred, if any). Of course I have no way of knowing that the sample is random,
but this gives an impression of the proportion of spamblogs out there.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Of the 100 tests, 39 of them were spamblogs (including the following "themes": Adult,
Ammunition, Australia travel, Belts, Broker Mortgage, Cells, Christian dating, College,
Cosmetic x2, Craft, Credit, Diaper, Disease sites, Fashion, Football, Healthcare products,
Home Builder, Laser hair removal, Line of credit, Mortgage x2, Notes, Paris travel,
Pasadena travel, Plus size, Pottery, Reality TV, Recipe, Sports Supplement, Stock,
Tennessee, Tools, Transportation, Used treadmills, plus four miscellaneous junk sites
with various content but clearly of a spam blog type). 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The 61 "real" blogs were of various quality (including 10 blogs with only a single
post more than a month old, but which were noticeably written by humans. Usually to
say "Like everyone else I know, I am going to start blogging now, and this is my blog").
But this gives me a rough estimate of the proportion of blogspot blogs that are spammy,
call it 40%. Is this a problem? I'm not sure, as the only way I come across them is
by the random search, or occasionally they will turn up when I search blogs using &lt;a href=http://www.technorati.com /&gt;Technorati&gt; (but
it's quite clear that they are spammy; I need not follow a link to &lt;i&gt;"Weight Loss
Plans Weight Loss Plans Information About Weight Loss Plans click on this link to
discover how good nutrition can help with dieting and weight lossNutrition advice
Atkins Diet Best Fat Burners Cabbage Soup Diet Calories Counting Calories Diabetes
Diet Diabetic Diet Diet Pills Diet Pill"&lt;/i&gt; when I am looking for a [real] blog that
discusses "cabbage soup" [I somehow doubt I would take this route, however, with &lt;a href=http://www.epicurious.com /&gt;Epicurious&gt; just
around the corner]). Surely they must be useful in some way to the designers; I'm
just not sure how.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Although I didn't spend any time reading the "real" blogs that jumped out at me, I
have to mention the blog of celticwanderlust, whose last entry happened to refer to
our next holiday destination (just a few days): &lt;i&gt;No, the Germans haven't bombed
London again. It's much, much worse. The British have invaded Tallinn!!! Stag parties
are terrorising this town, holding it hostage with there need to to be drunk, naked
and loud all at the same time! I became used to this when the british invaded dublin
(as if 900 years wasn't enough) and destroyed our pub and club culture....&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We'll have to see if we manage to avoid the invasion; we're mostly after history and
food (and definitely not being simultaneously drunk, naked and loud). &lt;/font&gt;&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=bca98722-aa0c-4783-afa3-aa959121749b" /&gt;</description>
      <category>read</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=ccb1d509-8028-4ab6-a199-8a4ef46ff283</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,ccb1d509-8028-4ab6-a199-8a4ef46ff283.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <font face="Verdana" size="2">As promised <a href="http://newpics.org/david/LondonCycleCommuting.aspx">yesterday</a>,
here are all the photos from my cycle commute to work this morning:<br />
Caption 1: It's raining. And chilly. So I decided not to take the camera on my cycle
commute.<br />
Caption 2: I decided not to take the cycle either.<br />
Caption 3: So why am I bothering to write captions for nonexistent photos of a nonexistent
journey? Hmmm I'll have to think about that one.<br /><br />
One of the disadvantages of being close to several useful bus routes is that it's
very easy to take the lazy way out and leave the bike behind. It adds about 20 minutes
to my commuting time, but gives me a chance to read. Those of you who may think my
reading choices are unusual, individualistic or somehow out of the mainstream will
be very disappointed to learn that I am following a massive public trend with my current
choice of reading material. Yes, I have joined in the fad and am now reading <i>Trilby</i> by
George du Maurier (OK, I'm a little behind the bleeding edge of this fad which had
its heyday nearly 100 years ago, but I'm a follower not a leader). As for reading
it, well, it's certainly a product of its time: it's set in Paris and chock full of
clever French <i>bons mots</i>, well, even entire conversations that are not entirely
transparent to a dullard/simpleton reader who does not read French (surely the sign
of an inferior education). But the real delight is being introduced to the original
Svengali, whose name has of course entered the English lexicon "<i> to designate one
who exercises a controlling or mesmeric influence on another, freq. for some sinister
purpose.</i>" (Oxford English Dictionary). But he is introduced in a very subtle manner
which gives no clues whatsoever that he may have sinister motives:<br /><br />
First, a tall bony individual of any age between thirty and forty-five, of Jewish
aspect, wll-featured but sinister. He was very shabby and dirty, and wore a red <i>béret</i> and
a large velveteen cloak, with a big metal clasp at the collar. His thick heavy, languid
lustreless black hair fell down behind his ears on to his shoulders, in that musician-like
way that is so offensive to the normal Englishman. He had bold, brilliant black eyes,
with long heavy lids, a thin, sallow face, and a beard of burnt-up black, which grew
almost from under his eyelids, and over it his moustache, a shade lighter, fell in
two long spiral twists. He went by the name Svengali, and spoke fluent French with
a German accent and humourous German twists and idioms, and his voice was very thin
and mean and harsh, and often broke into a disagreeable falsetto.<br /><br />
There is no shortage of Svengali figures in the news: <a href="http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=86552">GhanaWeb</a> describes
Karl Rove as Bush's Svengali (and wishes for even half-a-Rove behind Ghana's President
Kufuor, perhaps missing the "sinister" implications of the term), and many other news
or "news" articles use the term in the same contexts. Other Svengalis appear (like
the original Svengali) in the music business (<a href="http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/snoop%20%20suge%20brought%20back%20together%20by%20wife">Suge
Knight to Snoop Dogg</a>, Alanis Morissette's "producer/collaborator/svengali" <a href="http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/entertainment/music/12015366.htm">Glenn
Ballard</a>, <a href="http://www.sundaylife.co.uk/features/story.jsp?story=652935">Dr.
Dre</a> [who I believe is NOT a real DOCTOR!] to The Game, and numerous others). Maybe
some day I too will become a Svengali, but first I'll need a velveteen cloak and a
bad dye job. </font>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=ccb1d509-8028-4ab6-a199-8a4ef46ff283" />
      </body>
      <title>No photos here, please move along</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,ccb1d509-8028-4ab6-a199-8a4ef46ff283.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/NoPhotosHerePleaseMoveAlong.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:03:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;font face="Verdana" size="2"&gt;As promised &lt;a href=http://newpics.org/david/LondonCycleCommuting.aspx&gt;yesterday&lt;/a&gt;,
here are all the photos from my cycle commute to work this morning:&lt;br&gt;
Caption 1: It's raining. And chilly. So I decided not to take the camera on my cycle
commute.&lt;br&gt;
Caption 2: I decided not to take the cycle either.&lt;br&gt;
Caption 3: So why am I bothering to write captions for nonexistent photos of a nonexistent
journey? Hmmm I'll have to think about that one.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
One of the disadvantages of being close to several useful bus routes is that it's
very easy to take the lazy way out and leave the bike behind. It adds about 20 minutes
to my commuting time, but gives me a chance to read. Those of you who may think my
reading choices are unusual, individualistic or somehow out of the mainstream will
be very disappointed to learn that I am following a massive public trend with my current
choice of reading material. Yes, I have joined in the fad and am now reading &lt;i&gt;Trilby&lt;/i&gt; by
George du Maurier (OK, I'm a little behind the bleeding edge of this fad which had
its heyday nearly 100 years ago, but I'm a follower not a leader). As for reading
it, well, it's certainly a product of its time: it's set in Paris and chock full of
clever French &lt;i&gt;bons mots&lt;/i&gt;, well, even entire conversations that are not entirely
transparent to a dullard/simpleton reader who does not read French (surely the sign
of an inferior education). But the real delight is being introduced to the original
Svengali, whose name has of course entered the English lexicon "&lt;i&gt; to designate one
who exercises a controlling or mesmeric influence on another, freq. for some sinister
purpose.&lt;/i&gt;" (Oxford English Dictionary). But he is introduced in a very subtle manner
which gives no clues whatsoever that he may have sinister motives:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
First, a tall bony individual of any age between thirty and forty-five, of Jewish
aspect, wll-featured but sinister. He was very shabby and dirty, and wore a red &lt;i&gt;béret&lt;/i&gt; and
a large velveteen cloak, with a big metal clasp at the collar. His thick heavy, languid
lustreless black hair fell down behind his ears on to his shoulders, in that musician-like
way that is so offensive to the normal Englishman. He had bold, brilliant black eyes,
with long heavy lids, a thin, sallow face, and a beard of burnt-up black, which grew
almost from under his eyelids, and over it his moustache, a shade lighter, fell in
two long spiral twists. He went by the name Svengali, and spoke fluent French with
a German accent and humourous German twists and idioms, and his voice was very thin
and mean and harsh, and often broke into a disagreeable falsetto.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There is no shortage of Svengali figures in the news: &lt;a href=http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=86552&gt;GhanaWeb&lt;/a&gt; describes
Karl Rove as Bush's Svengali (and wishes for even half-a-Rove behind Ghana's President
Kufuor, perhaps missing the "sinister" implications of the term), and many other news
or "news" articles use the term in the same contexts. Other Svengalis appear (like
the original Svengali) in the music business (&lt;a href=http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/snoop%20%20suge%20brought%20back%20together%20by%20wife&gt;Suge
Knight to Snoop Dogg&lt;/a&gt;, Alanis Morissette's "producer/collaborator/svengali" &lt;a href=http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/entertainment/music/12015366.htm&gt;Glenn
Ballard&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=http://www.sundaylife.co.uk/features/story.jsp?story=652935&gt;Dr.
Dre&lt;/a&gt; [who I believe is NOT a real DOCTOR!] to The Game, and numerous others). Maybe
some day I too will become a Svengali, but first I'll need a velveteen cloak and a
bad dye job. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=ccb1d509-8028-4ab6-a199-8a4ef46ff283" /&gt;</description>
      <category>bike;read</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=03265d6b-228a-45b9-b157-ba5792cb40a3</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,03265d6b-228a-45b9-b157-ba5792cb40a3.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <font face="Verdana" size="2">I grew up
in a fairly conservative church -- conservative enough that (at least for a while)
there was a wall display of <a href="http://www.chick.com/">Jack Chick</a> cartoon
tracts. These tracts come in quite an <a href="http://www.chick.com/catalog/tractlist.asp">impressive
range</a> including all sorts of <a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0044/0044_01.asp">tough</a><a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0086/0086_01.asp">guy</a><a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/1003/1003_01.asp">themes</a>,
some that have very <a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0042/0042_01.asp">specific</a><a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0074/0074_01.asp">religious</a><a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0014/0014_01.asp">targets</a>,
as well as some <a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0046/0046_01.asp">timely</a><a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/1008/1008_01.asp">issues</a>.<br /><br />
Their bread and butter, however, is <a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0001/0001_01.asp">"This
is Your Life"</a>, which tells the tale of a successful man struck down in the prime
of life, and has been translated into more than 100 different languages. To me it's
most interesting to see the different depictions of "success", depending upon the
language. The standard image of success features a Corvette, a cardigan/turtleneck
combo, a cold drink, a pipe, and a TV showing some sort of hostage drama:<br /><img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/0001/0001_02.gif" alt="Image of success" /><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">EDIT</span> NOTE: I guess I cross-linked to Chick's
images and they don't approve, since now my images are broken. As it would be a little
sneaky to download their copyrighted images and post them myself for the purpose of
ridicule, I'll just leave my comments here, although they don't make much sense without
the accompanying images. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Sorry</span><br /><br />
This image is used (with translated text) for many languages including Albanian, Esperanto,
Euskara, Luxembourgian and a host of others (including, strangely, Inuit). However,
other cultures get different images of success:<br /><br /><img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/1723/1723_02.gif" alt="Waray-Waray success" /><br />
In Waray-Waray (a Phillippine language) success is family and drink;<br /><br /><img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/0426/0426_02.gif" alt="Vietnamese success" /><br />
The Vietnamese guy (like other east Asians, although his face may be slightly altered)
may not have a family but he's got a serious car;<br /><br /><img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/0852/0852_02.gif" alt="African success" /><br />
In Swahili (and most other African languages) it's all about romance (and the lady
gets the drink);<br /><br /><img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/0893/0893_02.gif" alt="Arabic success" /><br />
The Arabic (and Farsi) guy gets the English Corvette, costume and the same TV show,
but not a pipe (or a razor);<br /><br /><img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/1353/1353_02.gif" alt="Bengali success" /><br />
In Bengali (and other languages of India), it's enjoying drinks and canapes with another
couple;<br /><br /><img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/1698/1698_02.gif" alt="Fijian success" /><br />
But you can't beat Fiji (or Tahiti): chilling out on a deserted island with a lady,
a bottle, and a nice Hawaiian shirt.<br /><br />
They have one thing in common, though: they all get chopped down by Death, having
only time to utter something akin to the English "Whaaa?"<br />
: <img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/0896/0896_03.gif" alt="In the prime of life (SHQIP)" /><br /></font>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=03265d6b-228a-45b9-b157-ba5792cb40a3" />
      </body>
      <title>Images of Success</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,03265d6b-228a-45b9-b157-ba5792cb40a3.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/ImagesOfSuccess.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:09:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;font face="Verdana" size="2"&gt;I grew up in a fairly conservative church -- conservative
enough that (at least for a while) there was a wall display of &lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/"&gt;Jack
Chick&lt;/a&gt; cartoon tracts. These tracts come in quite an &lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/catalog/tractlist.asp"&gt;impressive
range&lt;/a&gt; including all sorts of &lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0044/0044_01.asp"&gt;tough&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0086/0086_01.asp"&gt;guy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/1003/1003_01.asp"&gt;themes&lt;/a&gt;,
some that have very &lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0042/0042_01.asp"&gt;specific&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0074/0074_01.asp"&gt;religious&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0014/0014_01.asp"&gt;targets&lt;/a&gt;,
as well as some &lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0046/0046_01.asp"&gt;timely&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/1008/1008_01.asp"&gt;issues&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Their bread and butter, however, is &lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0001/0001_01.asp"&gt;"This
is Your Life"&lt;/a&gt;, which tells the tale of a successful man struck down in the prime
of life, and has been translated into more than 100 different languages. To me it's
most interesting to see the different depictions of "success", depending upon the
language. The standard image of success features a Corvette, a cardigan/turtleneck
combo, a cold drink, a pipe, and a TV showing some sort of hostage drama:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/0001/0001_02.gif" alt="Image of success"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;EDIT&lt;/span&gt; NOTE: I guess I cross-linked to Chick's
images and they don't approve, since now my images are broken. As it would be a little
sneaky to download their copyrighted images and post them myself for the purpose of
ridicule, I'll just leave my comments here, although they don't make much sense without
the accompanying images. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Sorry&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This image is used (with translated text) for many languages including Albanian, Esperanto,
Euskara, Luxembourgian and a host of others (including, strangely, Inuit). However,
other cultures get different images of success:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/1723/1723_02.gif" alt="Waray-Waray success"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In Waray-Waray (a Phillippine language) success is family and drink;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/0426/0426_02.gif" alt="Vietnamese success"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The Vietnamese guy (like other east Asians, although his face may be slightly altered)
may not have a family but he's got a serious car;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/0852/0852_02.gif" alt="African success"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In Swahili (and most other African languages) it's all about romance (and the lady
gets the drink);&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/0893/0893_02.gif" alt="Arabic success"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The Arabic (and Farsi) guy gets the English Corvette, costume and the same TV show,
but not a pipe (or a razor);&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/1353/1353_02.gif" alt="Bengali success"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In Bengali (and other languages of India), it's enjoying drinks and canapes with another
couple;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/1698/1698_02.gif" alt="Fijian success"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But you can't beat Fiji (or Tahiti): chilling out on a deserted island with a lady,
a bottle, and a nice Hawaiian shirt.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
They have one thing in common, though: they all get chopped down by Death, having
only time to utter something akin to the English "Whaaa?"&lt;br&gt;
: &lt;img src="http://www.chick.com/tractimages93887/0896/0896_03.gif" alt="In the prime of life (SHQIP)"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=03265d6b-228a-45b9-b157-ba5792cb40a3" /&gt;</description>
      <category>language;read</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://newpics.org/david/Trackback.aspx?guid=1bc09458-d20a-4efb-9201-5f89dd66275b</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://newpics.org/david/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,1bc09458-d20a-4efb-9201-5f89dd66275b.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Many years ago, a small, bedraggled paperback found its way into our family home.
Not a particularly unusual occurrence as hundreds (if not thousands) of small, bedraggled
paperbacks have appeared in similar manners over the years. But one in particular
had a great impact upon our family: <em>Scoundrels, Fiends and Human Monsters</em> by
Cliff Howe (pub. 1958).  
</p>
        <p>
It didn't look like much; in fact, the first few chapters were torn out (so we were
able to learn that Thomas Dun had his limbs sawn off with jagged knives, etc. as punishment
for his crimes, but not what those crimes might have been). But the first full chapter
remaining was that of Sawney Bean(e), notorious cannibalistic murderer of the __th
century (a remarkably similar text to that chapter can be found <a href="http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ng9.htm">here</a>;
more on this source later).
</p>
        <p>
In our home, the vicious character of Sawney <em>Beane</em> became a less frightening
but more pervasive evil influence, taking over the role of bogey-man from an assortment
of imaginary wolves, mice, and undifferentiated ghosts and spirits who had previously
carried scare-duties on their own but had lost their spark for one reason or another.
Beane mostly hovered around the dinner table (and occasionally communion service at
church) in case reference to cannibalism was appropriate for the given meal (surprisingly
often, I found), although sometimes he was invoked to scare younger children when
our usual range of bogey-men (Rick James, Ozzy Osbourne, Michael Jackson) wasn't enough.
</p>
        <p>
Unfortunately, it may have been too good to be true. A recent piece in the <a href="http://www.forteantimes.com/mag_info/this_issue.shtml">Fortean
Times</a> is rather dismissive of the whole tale; a host of other sources join in
a solid and robust debunking of the most important details of the whole matter. The
title tells the story in Urquhart's <a href="http://www.ayrshirehistory.org.uk/sawney/myth.htm">"Sawney
Beane: Myth or Myth"</a>, "<em>The reaction of any serious historian... to the Sawney
Bean myth should be polite incredulity at least, and outright denunciation at best...." </em>and
more information of a debunking nature (along with a snippet of information about
films inspired by the Beane legend) can be found at <a href="http://www.mysteriousbritain.co.uk/legends/sawney_bean.html">Mysterious
Britain</a>. Not everyone is a debunker, however; those with strong stomachs (especially
with regard to unwanted sound effects/midi music on web pages) may enjoy <a href="http://sawneybean.tripod.com/index.htm">this
site</a> which offers not only a full complement of dripping blood effects, skulls
and the eerie like, but also your own Sawney Beane email address!!!1!111!!
</p>
        <p>
To me, perhaps the greatest disappointment was not the debunking of the Beane legend
(after all, certain elements just didn't ring quite true), but the discovery that
Mr Cliff Howe's extensive historical research could be found, nearly word-for-word,
in a <a href="http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ng9.htm">slightly older text</a>:
the Newgate Calendar. 
</p>
        <blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
          <p>
As described at <a href="http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngintro.htm">exclassics.com</a>,
"<em>The <u>Newgate Calendar</u> was one of those books, along with a Bible, <u>Foxe's
book of Martyrs</u> and the <u>Pilgrim's Progress</u>, most likely to be found in
any English home between 1750 and 1850. Children were encouraged to read it because
it was believed to inculcate principles of right living -- by fear of punishment if
not by the dull and earnest morals appended to the stories of highwaymen and other
felons.</em>" 
</p>
        </blockquote>
        <p dir="ltr">
To think, the great historian from whom I learned about these important historical
figures (fiendish though they might be) was merely a fan of the Newgate Calendar. 
I guess my search for his other seminal work (<em>Lovers and Libertines: World's Greatest
Lovers, </em>1958) is not so urgent...
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=1bc09458-d20a-4efb-9201-5f89dd66275b" />
      </body>
      <title>Sawney Beane, Murderer Most Wretched</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newpics.org/david/PermaLink,guid,1bc09458-d20a-4efb-9201-5f89dd66275b.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://newpics.org/david/SawneyBeaneMurdererMostWretched.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:51:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Many years ago, a small, bedraggled paperback found its way into our family home.
Not a particularly unusual occurrence as hundreds (if not thousands) of small, bedraggled
paperbacks have appeared in similar manners over the years. But one in particular
had a great impact upon our family: &lt;em&gt;Scoundrels, Fiends and Human Monsters&lt;/em&gt; by
Cliff Howe (pub. 1958).&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It didn't look like much; in fact, the first few chapters were torn out (so we were
able to learn that Thomas Dun had his limbs sawn off with jagged knives, etc. as punishment
for his crimes, but not what those crimes might have been). But the first full chapter
remaining was that of Sawney Bean(e), notorious cannibalistic murderer of the __th
century (a remarkably similar text to that chapter can be found &lt;a href="http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ng9.htm"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;;
more on this source later).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In our home, the vicious character of Sawney &lt;em&gt;Beane&lt;/em&gt; became a less frightening
but more pervasive evil influence, taking over the role of bogey-man from an assortment
of imaginary wolves, mice, and undifferentiated ghosts and spirits who had previously
carried scare-duties on their own but had lost their spark for one reason or another.
Beane mostly hovered around the dinner table (and occasionally communion service at
church) in case reference to cannibalism was appropriate for the given meal (surprisingly
often, I found), although sometimes he was invoked to scare younger children when
our usual range of bogey-men (Rick James, Ozzy Osbourne, Michael Jackson) wasn't enough.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Unfortunately, it may have been too good to be true. A recent piece in the &lt;a href="http://www.forteantimes.com/mag_info/this_issue.shtml"&gt;Fortean
Times&lt;/a&gt; is rather dismissive of the whole tale; a host of other sources join in
a solid and robust debunking of the most important details of the whole matter. The
title tells the story in Urquhart's &lt;a href="http://www.ayrshirehistory.org.uk/sawney/myth.htm"&gt;"Sawney
Beane: Myth or Myth"&lt;/a&gt;, "&lt;em&gt;The reaction of any serious historian... to the Sawney
Bean myth should be polite incredulity at least, and outright denunciation at best...." &lt;/em&gt;and
more information of a debunking nature (along with a snippet of information about
films inspired by the Beane legend) can be found at &lt;a href="http://www.mysteriousbritain.co.uk/legends/sawney_bean.html"&gt;Mysterious
Britain&lt;/a&gt;. Not everyone is a debunker, however; those with strong stomachs (especially
with regard to unwanted sound effects/midi music on web pages) may enjoy &lt;a href="http://sawneybean.tripod.com/index.htm"&gt;this
site&lt;/a&gt; which offers not only a full complement of dripping blood effects, skulls
and the eerie like, but also your own Sawney Beane email address!!!1!111!!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
To me, perhaps the greatest disappointment was not the debunking of the Beane legend
(after all, certain elements just didn't ring quite true), but the discovery that
Mr Cliff Howe's extensive historical research could be found, nearly word-for-word,
in a &lt;a href="http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ng9.htm"&gt;slightly older text&lt;/a&gt;:
the Newgate Calendar. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
As described at &lt;a href="http://www.exclassics.com/newgate/ngintro.htm"&gt;exclassics.com&lt;/a&gt;,
"&lt;em&gt;The &lt;u&gt;Newgate Calendar&lt;/u&gt; was one of those books, along with a Bible, &lt;u&gt;Foxe's
book of Martyrs&lt;/u&gt; and the &lt;u&gt;Pilgrim's Progress&lt;/u&gt;, most likely to be found in
any English home between 1750 and 1850. Children were encouraged to read it because
it was believed to inculcate principles of right living -- by fear of punishment if
not by the dull and earnest morals appended to the stories of highwaymen and other
felons.&lt;/em&gt;" 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
&lt;p dir=ltr&gt;
To think, the great historian from whom I learned about these important historical
figures (fiendish though they might be) was merely a fan of the Newgate Calendar.&amp;nbsp;
I guess my search for his other seminal work (&lt;em&gt;Lovers and Libertines: World's Greatest
Lovers, &lt;/em&gt;1958) is not so urgent...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://newpics.org/david/aggbug.ashx?id=1bc09458-d20a-4efb-9201-5f89dd66275b" /&gt;</description>
      <category>read</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>