Just let me vent and I'll move on...

Wednesday, July 12, 2006 2:28:39 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)

For three days it’s been troubling me, eating at me, and I have to say it: Some questions in this world do not have a definite answer. There are many valuable opinions on many subjects, even those of faith, which is why in a social, small-talk setting, you’re not supposed to discuss religion or politics. Stay away, because there are those who think they know everything, and if you don’t agree with them, you’re just flat-out wrong, pagan, going straight to Hell and I hope you burn on the way, heretical idiots.

 

I’m sorry, but in this world, there are a lot of questions that do not have answers. I still believe there are definite right and wrong, but I think there are a lot more things that aren’t so clear. I’m not a moral relativist; I’m a realist.

 

I confess, I’m a recovering know-it-all. There have been many times when I’ve wanted to show everyone how smart and full-of-faith I am by having the answer to every question there is. But face it:

* There isn’t always an answer here on earth.

* I don't know everything - and I'm actually okay with that.

* I am not God – nor do I want to be, nor do you want me to be – and so my pronouncements are no more valid than yours or anyone else’s.

* High-minded, arrogant ideas and stubborn clinging to one’s own “rightness” tend to go out the window when one realizes that each individual (even if he’s a liberal, God forbid) is of great worth to God and the Kingdom, and preaching how wrong he is isn’t going to help him a jot.

 

Recently I let myself be dragged into a fairly stupid discussion-slash-argument. It started over a matter of opinion – and irony – and turned into a slugfest, complete with arrogant assertions and calling into question the original writer’s salvation, believe it or not, over a statue. Anyone who didn’t agree with our arrogant friend was obviously a heretic – though I believe my own comments on the matter were considered too far beneath his supreme intelligence to even be acknowledged. Just as well. I looked him up and learned a little about him, including his new faith, young marriage, and current seminary enrollment. I have read many of his own internet posts and find much of what he writes for himself thorough, well-researched, and well-spoken, though a bit heavy-handed and dogmatic at times. However, it’s when someone else has a differing opinion that he seems to dissolve into name-calling. Sad.

 

It’s not the lively discussion that irritates me as much as the arrogance and name-calling. I know of few people who have come to a saving faith in Jesus Christ because they were shouted down in a discussion by a Christian. If I blatantly and repeatedly tell people that they are stupid and that their opinions, feelings and beliefs are invalid, and that they're flat-out wrong, they seldom wish to share the joy I claim to have in Christ and the communion with the Saints. You can catch a lot more flies with honey than with your self-righteous arrogance stick. Showing people you care about them is a lot more effective than showing them how superior you are.

 

I can only hope that said arrogant seminarian meets a few actual people before he takes his first pastorate and learns to care. And then I sit back and thank some people who taught me that loving my neighbor is a lot more important than always winning the argument: Kevin, Mikki, Michelle, Angela, Anne, Andrea, Masha, Jason, and yes, even Lu. May I always remember humility before my pride gets in the way.

 

Philippians 2:1-4: “If you have any encouragement from being united with Christ, if any comfort from his love, if any fellowship with the Spirit, if any tenderness and compassion, then make my joy complete by being like-minded, having the same love, being one in spirit and purpose. Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit, but in humility consider others better than yourselves. Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but also to the interests of others.”

Wednesday, July 12, 2006 2:58:36 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
I'm not sure what discussion-slash-argument you're talking about. Can you help me? :)

Yes, I too have wondered how that first pastorate is going to work out for him. I just hope that in his next few years in seminary he learns a little bit of humility.

What I've discovered is that people like that--people who are convinced that they know everything and that if you don't agree with them you're going to hell--are speaking and acting out of a lot of fear. They have so wrapped themselves up in their religion and in being correct, that they are scared to death of what it might mean if someone else is correct. To have someone else, who disagrees with them, be correct (and I believe that in many situations two dissenting opinions can both be "correct") calls in to question everything they believe in. And if their beliefs are questioned then they might have to--God forbid--think for themselves.

It's actually very sad. I feel sorry for people like that. They're so wrapped up in being correct that they've stopped seeing people as precious humans and started seeing them as opinions to be squashed.

I appreciate your comments. I found them corrective, thoughtful, engaging, and funny.
Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:22:22 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Wow. I had stumbled upon that post just being nosey around here a few days ago. I didn't bother to look at comments, just shuddered at the picture. How fascinating/disturbing. I could write a lot, but I'm a bit overwhelmed, so I'll just say: Why don't some people understand that living out a faith IS a form of evangelism? I was certainly never swayed by the tracts handed out in college by the nearby crazy -- oops, sorry, Christian college, but I am constantly swayed by acts of love and generosity and approachable dialogue that, at least to me, show the true nature of Christ. And okay, I'll say more, nationalism isn't usually a good thing. The Nazi party was a nationalist party, do some people want that to return? And what did that guy have against graduate school, besides apparently writing off everything said by a graduate of said school? And last one, you were very eloquent :)
Wednesday, July 12, 2006 6:23:39 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
I'd like to stumble upon that post. I find that people usually (but not always) do mature as they leave college for the "real world" and, like you, feel so sorry for those who don't. But as usual, you spoke my feelings so much more eloquently! I also am a recovering know-it-all (you all have helped me a BUNCH!) and feel ashamed of the way I once was!
Big Mama
Wednesday, July 12, 2006 8:56:27 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Preach it, sister. I have gradually come to the same understanding that you speak of (but am surprised and humbled to find myself in your list...how did I do that??)

My favorite part of this was "(even if he's a liberal, God forbid)" :)
Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:51:39 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Big Mama, check out Pastor Mom on my blogroll on the right. See the post called "Neighbors".

College Roomie, there was something in a particular Letter to the Editor about Bible thumpers once long ago, in which a wise person said, "I prefer to open my Bible and read it..." suggesting that perhaps those who were indeed thumping might be a little more concerned for others if they would do the same. Besides being a good zinger, it was a good point as well. :)

thank you all for humoring me and letting me vent. Coming soon, more cute stories of Mark and the cute things he has done and the cute things he says and... well, you get the idea.
Thursday, July 13, 2006 1:39:42 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Good day, all.

It is indeed difficult to answer every question, because, as Jenny noted, we cannot answer them all. God has provided all the revelation we need in the Scriptures, but he has not provided us all of the answers - not even about himself. We simply cannot comprehend it.

Jenny, before you assume I didn't answer you because I "considered [it] too far beneath [my] supreme intelligence to even be acknowledged", you should have asked. As I voluntarily removed myself from the post, I have not looked back at it since. However, without recalling it, I would assume that I did not answer your comments because I either agreed in principle or did not disagree enough - if I answer every comment, my comment will be too long and no one will read it! I'm sorry you felt ignored - it was not my intention.

How curious that you accuse me of name-calling, while calling me arrogant. Is that any less a name than ignorant? Isn't "Bible-thumper" name calling? I do not seek your apology, merely an acknowledgment that when we read an opinion, we must decide what the nature of the opinion is - whether it be arrogant or ignorant, drivel or heavy-handed and dogmatic. Ok?

Some helpful details about me, to overcome incorrect (by definition, ignorant - not a value word, but a state of being word restricted to the current subject matter) assumptions.

My faith is not new. I was saved by the grace of God in Christ Jesus 11 years ago. I was licensed to preach 7 years ago and ordained 4 years ago, the first by a "liberal" denomination, the second by a "conservative" one.

I had a "real job" in the "real world" with "actual people" for ten years after college. God has worked through me, though with no talent or quality of my own, to save marriages, save souls, and help myriads of people. I have cared much more than you can imagine, been broken repeatedly, and blessed God for it - although seldom during the breaking!

I have a graduate degree already, not in anything religious. In fact, it happens to be in something that is neither an MBA nor a hard science...exactly what I was speaking of.

God has seen to give grace to me such that I am allowed to read, study, memorize, pray on, and apply the Bible daily. I thank him for these gifts of time, inclination and ability, which are not of my own, but his. Thus, the "zinger" or "good point" is neither.

If you feel I cannot tolerate dissenting opinions, you should check out my blogroll, on which I link to four liberal sites: The Cranky Liberal, Courting Destiny, The Moderate Liberal (no longer active, but Mark still comments), and Barefoot in the Wilderness. I link to them because we are able to have discussions about things which include identifying when one of us is duplicitous, deceitful, ignorant, spouting drivel, etc, and work though it...without threatening to shut down the discussion. I enjoy hearing alternate opinions, and those men and women have helped me to grow intellectually and spiritually - but not neccesarily because they were right. Sometimes I was, sometimes they were, sometimes we both could be. However, step one in spiritual growth is recognizing that if I say "A" and you say, "not A", we can't both be right.

I would appreciate it if any of you stopped by my site and commented on anything there. My site lets me know when people comment, and I always address people with questions and opposing ideas (at least until we understand both each other's positions and, if necessary, that we are immovable).

Finally, I disagree with your flies and honey analogy. As God writes in Jude, "And of some have compassion, making a difference: And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh." In today's post-modern, moral relativist society, many more need to know that they are sinners before they realize a need for the love of Christ. As I go on a visit this week, I will see a man who was found by a church member walking down the road, apparently destitute. He told a story about hitchiking to Chicago to see a son who is about to go to Iraq. I will ask him about his son, when he leaves, what we can do to help him with this goal...and if he thinks he is a good person (www.wayofthemaster.com). He will receive both compassion and fear. However, a smart person spouting moral relativism doesn't think he is a sinner, and needs fear.

Peace in Christ,
Thursday, July 13, 2006 4:13:08 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Heavens, Jenny. I feel somewhat responsible for his presence here. Sorry about that.
Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:32:34 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Jur...you can moderate unwanted comments here, right? ;)
Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:05:19 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
So, you prefer to ban us from commenting on your sites, and do the name calling behind closed doors. Nice.
mrshammer
Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:38:27 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
I am sure I will be banned, as well. I was part of what I thought was an intelligent conversation and was surprised to hear that the open-mindedness of the blogger, as well as the commenters, only extends as far as their own opinions.

I think Hammer's comments above were very thoughtful, and very respectful. His attempts to discuss things, and possibly find some common ground here, were met by more unwillingness on the part of the people here. I suppose I had the wrong ideas about intelligent blogs. I always thought they were for discussion and exchange of ideas.

As an evangelical, fundamentalist Christian, I have had my beliefs attacked more times than I can count. It is never much of a problem for me, because I am incredibly secure in my salvation. Do you normally experience much opposition from society? It seems that often progressives fit in much easier in today's society, as a blending of culture and faith makes them more pallatable. I prefer to speak the truth in love, even if it means that not everyone is my friend.

I am sorry for the way that Hammer was treated, as was not deserving of the name calling and banning, simply for sticking up for God's Word.
Thursday, July 13, 2006 10:12:24 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
How about you all just read the next post rather than filling up this comment space...
Thanks

Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):